Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Designing and Validating a Basketball Learning and Performance Assessment Instrument (BALPAI).

Sergio J Ibáñez, Sergio Martinez-Fernández, Sergio Gonzalez-Espinosa, Javier García-Rubio, Sebastián Feu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ongoing Bidirectional Feedback between Planning and Assessment in Educational Contexts: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of the Actions of Net Zone Approach in Padel: Validation of the NAPOA Instrument.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design and Validation of the Instrument for the Measurement of Learning and Performance in Football.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio J IbáñezFaculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Sergio Martinez-FernándezFaculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Sergio Gonzalez-EspinosaFaculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Javier García-RubioFaculty of Sport Science, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Sebastián FeuFaculty of Education, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe assessment of learning in basketball in the PE class, and in training sessions of young players, requires valid, reliable, and trustworthy tools. The purpose of this research was to design and validate the Basketball Learning and Performance Assessment Instrument (BALPAI) that assesses simultaneously decision making, technical execution and efficacy. The play actions are codified using a categorical system, awarding a score for each category (1 = inadequate action; 2 = neutral action 3 = adequate action). An example of a summative procedure for assessing decision making in dribbling is: (1) Dribbling to a place where there is defensive pressure and there is a free teammate able to receive the pass; (2) Dribbling to a place where there is defensive pressure or a free teammate able to receive the pass; (3) Dribbling through a space where there is no defensive pressure and no free teammate able to receive the pass.

methodsA pilot study was performed following this procedure. A group of 13 experts participated in the assessment of the 33 elements (66 items) included in the BALPAI. Aiken's V formula was used to analyze content validity, and internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's α. Inter-observer reliability was determined among three observers who used the BALPAI to record the play actions in a 3 × 3 basketball match (N = 45 possessions) and was calculated with the Multirater κfree, obtaining an almost perfect agreement with values between 0.84 and 1.

resultsThe BALPAI has very high internal consistency (0.969), Interobserver reliability was almost perfect (>0.84 in all items) and Aiken's V coefficient (>0.71 in all items) attained a high value.

conclusionThe BALPAI proved to be a valid tool, with high internal consistency and reliability that makes it possible to perform a complete assessment of basketball in PE classes.

Indexed as

assessmentbasketballevaluationreliabilityteam sportvalidity

Identifiers

PMID31354590
PMCPMC6635796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.