ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR - An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Assessing anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms among Ebola survivors in Africa: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Article
- An analysis of data sources and study registries used in systematic reviews.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2022Article
- Adherence to literature search reporting guidelines in leading rheumatology journals' systematic reviews: umbrella review protocol.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians' contributions to systematic reviews.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Methodological approaches for developing and reporting living evidence synthesis: a study protocol.Open research Europe · 2021Article
- The collaboration and reporting quality of social welfare systematic reviews in the Campbell Collaboration online library.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.