Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354487›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Potential for Nuclear Medicine Therapy for Glioblastoma Treatment.

Clément Bailly, Aurelien Vidal, Coralie Bonnemaire, Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Michel Chérel, Amandine Pallardy, Caroline Rousseau, Emmanuel Garcion, Franck Lacoeuille, François Hindré and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Radionuclide-based theranostics - a promising strategy for lung cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Radioimmunotherapy study ofEJNMMI research · 2022
    Article
  14. An overview of current therapeutic strategies for glioblastoma and the role of CD73 as an alternative curative approach.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Clément BaillyNuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Aurelien VidalArronax, Saint-Herblain, France.
Coralie BonnemaireArronax, Saint-Herblain, France.
Françoise Kraeber-BodéréCRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Michel ChérelCRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Amandine PallardyNuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Caroline RousseauInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Angers, France.
Emmanuel GarcionTeam 17-Design and Application of Innovative Local Treatments in Glioblastoma, INSERM U1232 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes Angers (CRCINA), Nantes, France.
Franck LacoeuilleTeam 17-Design and Application of Innovative Local Treatments in Glioblastoma, INSERM U1232 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes Angers (CRCINA), Nantes, France.
François HindréTeam 17-Design and Application of Innovative Local Treatments in Glioblastoma, INSERM U1232 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Nantes Angers (CRCINA), Nantes, France.
Samuel ValableNormandie Université, Caen, France.
Myriam BernaudinNormandie Université, Caen, France.
Caroline Bodet-MilinNuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Mickaël BourgeoisNuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInstitut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCyceron · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRNantes Université · FRNormandie Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant adult brain tumor and has a very poor patient prognosis. The mean survival for highly proliferative glioblastoma is only 10 to 14 months despite an aggressive current therapeutic approach known as Stupp's protocol, which consists of debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite several clinical trials using anti-angiogenic targeted therapies, glioblastoma medical care remains without major progress in the last decade. Recent progress in nuclear medicine, has been mainly driven by advances in biotechnologies such as radioimmunotherapy, radiopeptide therapy, and radionanoparticles, and these bring a new promising arsenal for glioblastoma therapy. For therapeutic purposes, nuclear medicine practitioners classically use β

Indexed as

cancerglioblastomanuclear medicinepeptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT)radioimmunotherapy (RIT)radionanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID31354487
PMCPMC6637301
OpenAlexW2952478096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.