Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354276›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2019

Machine learning techniques in a structural and functional MRI diagnostic approach in schizophrenia: a systematic review.

Renato de Filippis, Elvira Anna Carbone, Raffaele Gaetano, Antonella Bruni, Valentina Pugliese, Cristina Segura-Garcia, Pasquale De Fazio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. miRNA-Based Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Using Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. BPEN: Brain Posterior Evidential Network for trustworthy brain imaging analysis.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Improved patient identification by incorporating symptom severity in deep learning using neuroanatomic images in first episode schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renato de Filippis *Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Elvira Anna Carbone *Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Raffaele GaetanoDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Antonella BruniDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Valentina PuglieseDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Cristina Segura-GarciaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Pasquale De FazioDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of schizophrenia (SCZ) is made exclusively clinically, since specific biomarkers that can predict the disease accurately remain unknown. Machine learning (ML) represents a promising approach that could support clinicians in the diagnosis of mental disorders.

objectivesA systematic review, according to the PRISMA statement, was conducted to evaluate its accuracy to distinguish SCZ patients from healthy controls.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library through December 2018 using generic terms for ML techniques and SCZ without language or time restriction. Thirty-five studies were included in this review: eight of them used structural neuroimaging, twenty-six used functional neuroimaging and one both, with a minimum accuracy >60% (most of them 75-90%). Sensitivity, Specificity and accuracy were extracted from each publication or obtained directly from authors.

resultsSupport vector machine, the most frequent technique, if associated with other ML techniques achieved accuracy close to 100%. The prefrontal and temporal cortices appeared to be the most useful brain regions for the diagnosis of SCZ. ML analysis can efficiently detect significantly altered brain connectivity in patients with SCZ (eg, default mode network, visual network, sensorimotor network, frontoparietal network and salience network).

conclusionThe greater accuracy demonstrated by these predictive models and the new models resulting from the integration of multiple ML techniques will be increasingly decisive for early diagnosis and evaluation of the treatment response and to establish the prognosis of patients with SCZ. To achieve a real benefit for patients, the future challenge is to reach an accurate diagnosis not only through clinical evaluation but also with the aid of ML algorithms.

Indexed as

machine learningmultivariate pattern analysisresting-state fMRIschizophreniasMRIsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID31354276
PMCPMC6590624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.