Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354180›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2019

Fully Bayesian analysis of RNA-seq counts for the detection of gene expression heterosis.

Will Landau, Jarad Niemi, Dan Nettleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Will LandauDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University.
Jarad NiemiDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University.
Dan NettletonDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University.

Funding

Hierarchical Modeling and Parallelized Bayesian Inference for RNAseq AnalysisR01GM109458 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NETTLETON, DANIEL · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is the enhancement of the phenotype of hybrid progeny relative to their inbred parents. Heterosis is extensively used in agriculture, and the underlying mechanisms are unclear. To investigate the molecular basis of phenotypic heterosis, researchers search tens of thousands of genes for heterosis with respect to expression in the transcriptome. Difficulty arises in the assessment of heterosis due to composite null hypotheses and non-uniform distributions for p-values under these null hypotheses. Thus, we develop a general hierarchical model for count data and a fully Bayesian analysis in which an efficient parallelized Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm ameliorates the computational burden. We use our method to detect gene expression heterosis in a two-hybrid plant-breeding scenario, both in a real RNA-seq maize dataset and in simulation studies. In the simulation studies, we show our method has well-calibrated posterior probabilities and credible intervals when the model assumed in analysis matches the model used to simulate the data. Although model misspecification can adversely affect calibration, the methodology is still able to accurately rank genes. Finally, we show that hyperparameter posteriors are extremely narrow and an empirical Bayes (eBayes) approach based on posterior means from the fully Bayesian analysis provides virtually equivalent posterior probabilities, credible intervals, and gene rankings relative to the fully Bayesian solution. This evidence of equivalence provides support for the use of eBayes procedures in RNA-seq data analysis if accurate hyperparameter estimates can be obtained.

Indexed as

CUDAempirical Bayesgraphics processing unithierarchical modelhybrid vigornegative-binomial

Identifiers

PMID31354180
PMCPMC6660196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.