Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31354170›Full record

ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2018

Serial Cohabitation in Young Adulthood: Baby Boomers to Millennials.

Kasey J Eickmeyer, Wendy D Manning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.Journal of marriage and the family · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Does Re-Partnering Behavior Spread Among Former Spouses?European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Demography of Families: A Review of Patterns and Change.Journal of marriage and the family · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cohort Trends in Union Dissolution During Young Adulthood.Journal of marriage and the family · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kasey J EickmeyerBowling Green State University, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
Wendy D ManningBowling Green State University, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green, OH 43403.

Funding

Computing and Data CoreP2CHD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN L. · 2016 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The age at first marriage in the U.S. has consistently increased, while the age at cohabitation has stalled. These trends present an opportunity for serial cohabitation (multiple cohabiting unions). The authors argue that serial cohabitation must be measured among those at risk, who have ended their first cohabiting union. Drawing on data from the National Survey of Family Growth Cycle 6 (2002), and continuous 2006-2013 interview cycles, the authors find that serial cohabitation is increasing among women at risk. Millennials, born 1980-1984, had 50% higher rates of cohabiting twice or more after dissolving their first cohabitation. This increase, however, is not driven by the composition of Millennials at risk for serial cohabitation. This work demonstrates the importance of clearly defining who is at risk for serial cohabitation when reporting estimates, as well as continuing to examine how the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and serial cohabitation may shift over time.

Indexed as

Cohabitationcohortcoresidencelife coursesocial trends/social change

Identifiers

PMID31354170
PMCPMC6660145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.