ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2019
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- Subconscious value influences on science.Studies in history and philosophy of science · 2025Article
- The Integration and Growth of R in Soil Research: A 10-Year Analysis.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Using Open Science Tools to Teach Environmental Sciences.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- The most prevalent perceived barriers to sharing research data at the point of manuscript acceptance in health and life sciences: a survey at the University of Bristol.F1000Research · 2025Article
- The importance of democratized resources in early-career training for bioimage analysts and bioimaging scientists.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Investigating the practices and preferences of health scholars in sharing open research data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Biosafety, biosecurity, and bioethics.Monash bioethics review · 2024Review
- A precautionary approach to autonomous vehicles.AI and ethics · 2024Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Toward Identifying New Risk Aversions and Subsequent Limitations and Biases When Making De-identified Structured Data Sets Openly Available in a Post-LLM world.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- A Framework for Transparency in Precision Livestock Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Promotion of Hearing Health through Wikipedia Campaigns: Article Quality and Reach Assessment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Implementing the Co-Immune Open Innovation Program to Address Vaccination Hesitancy and Access to Vaccines: Retrospective Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2021Article
- Developing a scalable framework for partnerships between health agencies and the Wikimedia ecosystem.Research ideas and outcomes · 2021Article
- Promoting Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) During Brazilian Activities of Genomic and Epidemiological Surveillance of Arboviruses.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe open science movement is transforming scientific practice with the goal of enhancing the transparency, productivity, and reproducibility of research. Nevertheless, transparency is a complex concept, and efforts to promote some forms of transparency may do relatively little to advance other important forms of transparency.
objectivesDrawing from the literature in history, philosophy, and sociology of science, we aim to distinguish between different forms of scientific transparency. Our goal is to identify strategies for achieving forms of transparency that are relevant not only to scientists but also to decision makers and members of the public. DISCUSSION: We draw a distinction between "scientifically relevant transparency" and "socially relevant transparency." Most of the prominent strategies associated with the open science movement (e.g., making data publicly available and registering studies) are designed primarily to promote scientifically relevant transparency. To achieve socially relevant transparency, which is particularly important in fields like environmental health, further steps are needed to provide scientific information in ways that are relevant to decision makers and members of the public.
conclusionsPromoting socially relevant transparency will require a range of activities by many different individuals and institutions. We propose an array of strategies that can be pursued by scientists and other scholars, journals, universities, funders, government agencies, and members of the public. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.