Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31353935›Full record

ArticleBrain connectivity2019

Functional Connectivity of Language Regions of Stroke Patients with Expressive Aphasia During Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Neurofeedback.

Sujesh Sreedharan, K M Arun, P N Sylaja, Chandrasekharan Kesavadas, Ranganatha Sitaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain connectivity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeted neurorehabilitation strategies in post-stroke aphasia.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Callosal Aphasia after Stroke.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sujesh SreedharanDivision of Artificial Internal Organs, Department of Medical Devices Engineering, Biomedical Technology Wing, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST), Trivandrum, India.
K M ArunDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Intervention Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST), Trivandrum, India.
P N SylajaDepartment of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST), Trivandrum, India.
Chandrasekharan KesavadasDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Intervention Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST), Trivandrum, India.
Ranganatha SitaramInstitute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Center for Brain-Machine Interfaces and Neuromodulation, and Department of Psychiatry and Division of Neuroscience, Faculties of Engineering, Biology and Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke lesions in the language centers of the brain impair the language areas and their connectivity. This article describes the dynamics of functional connectivity (FC) of language areas (FCL) during real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (RT-fMRI)-based neurofeedback training for poststroke patients with expressive aphasia. The hypothesis is that FCL increases during the upregulation of language areas during neurofeedback training and that the training improves FCL with an increasing number of sessions and restores it toward normalcy. Four test and four control patients with expressive aphasia were recruited for the study along with four healthy volunteers termed as the normal group. The test and normal groups were administered four neurofeedback training sessions in between two test sessions, whereas the control group underwent only the two test sessions. The training session requires the subject to exercise language activity covertly so that it upregulates the feedback signal obtained from the Broca's area (in left inferior frontal gyrus) and amplifies the feedback when it is correlated with the Wernicke's area (in left superior temporal gyrus) using RT-fMRI. FC was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results indicate that the FC of the test group was weaker in the left hemisphere than that of the normal group, and post-training the connections have strengthened (correlation coefficient increases) in the left hemisphere when compared with the control group. The connections of language areas strengthened in both hemispheres during neurofeedback-based upregulation, and multiple training sessions strengthened new pathways and restored left hemispheric connections toward normalcy.

Indexed as

LanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackAphasia, BrocaBrainBrain MappingHumansNeural PathwaysStrokeTreatment Outcomeaphasiafunctional connectivityneurofeedbackreal-time fMRIself-regulationstroke

Identifiers

PMID31353935
PMCPMC6798872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.