Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31353422›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2019

Artificial Intelligence in Reproductive Urology.

Kevin Y Chu, Daniel E Nassau, Himanshu Arora, Soum D Lokeshwar, Vinayak Madhusoodanan, Ranjith Ramasamy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A review of artificial intelligence applications in in vitro fertilization.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Existing trends and applications of artificial intelligence in urothelial cancer A scoping review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Oxidative Stress and Idiopathic Male Infertility.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Machine learning for sperm selection.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin Y ChuDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 15th floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Daniel E NassauDepartment of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA.
Himanshu AroraDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 15th floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Soum D LokeshwarDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 15th floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Vinayak MadhusoodananDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 15th floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 15th floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. Ramasamy@miami.edu.
University of Miami · USLenox Hill Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe promise of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has been widely theorized over the past couple of decades. It has only been with technological advances over the past few years that physicians and computer scientists have started discovering its true clinical potential. Reproductive urology is a sub-discipline that AI could be of great contribution, as current predictive models and subjectivity within the field have several limitations. We review the literature to summarize recent AI applications in reproductive urology. RECENT

findingsEarly AI applications in reproductive urology focused on predicting semen parameters based on questionnaires that identify potential environmental factors and/or lifestyle habits impacting male fertility. AI has shown success in predicting the patient subpopulation most likely to need a genetic workup for azoospermia. With recent advances in image processing, automated sperm detection is a reality. Semen analyses, once a laboratory-only diagnostic test, have moved into health consumer homes with the advent of AI. AI's prospects in medicine are considerable and there is strong potential for AI within reproductive urology. Research in identifying the factors that can affect reproductive success either naturally or with assisted reproduction is of paramount importance to move the field forward.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceReproductive MedicineUrologyHumansMaleArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkMachine learningMale-factor infertilityReproductive urologyUrology

Identifiers

PMID31353422
OpenAlexW2964549232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.