Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31353413›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2020

Investigating the Effects of Spacing on Working Memory Training Outcome: A Randomized, Controlled, Multisite Trial in Older Adults.

Susanne M Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Chelsea M Parlett-Pelleriti, Seung Min Moon, Michelle Evans, Alexandra Kritzmacher, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz, Priti Shah, John Jonides

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04344028 (Examining the Potential for Placebo Effects in Cognitive Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04344028 nacompletednot on this map

Examining the Potential for Placebo Effects in Cognitive Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2020 to 2022Enrolled287ConditionsCognitive ChangeArmsTrue Cognitive Training Program, Control Cognitive Training Program, Positive Expectation Induction, Negative Expectation Induction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expectation effects in working memory training.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Feasibility of a Home-Based Task-Switching Training in Middle-Aged Caregivers.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022
    Article
  14. Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susanne M JaeggiSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine.
Martin BuschkuehlMIND Research Institute, Irvine, California.
Chelsea M Parlett-PelleritiSchmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California.
Seung Min MoonSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine.
Michelle EvansDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Alexandra KritzmacherDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Patricia A Reuter-LorenzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Priti ShahDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
John JonidesDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Working Memory Training in Older AdultsR01AG049006 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Cognitive Training and Brain Plasticity - Towards an Understanding of Mediators and ModeratorsK02AG054665 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2017 to 2021
$806k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG054665NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe majority of the population will experience some cognitive decline with age. Therefore, the development of effective interventions to mitigate age-related decline is critical for older adults' cognitive functioning and their quality of life.

methodsIn our randomized controlled multisite trial, we target participants' working memory (WM) skills, and in addition, we focus on the intervention's optimal scheduling in order to test whether and how the distribution of training sessions might affect task learning, and ultimately, transfer. Healthy older adults completed an intervention targeting either WM or general knowledge twice per day, once per day, or once every-other-day. Before and after the intervention and 3 months after training completion, participants were tested in a variety of cognitive domains, including those representing functioning in everyday life.

resultsIn contrast to our hypotheses, spacing seems to affect learning only minimally. We did observe some transfer effects, especially within the targeted cognitive domain (WM and inhibition/interference), which remained stable at the 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Our findings have practical implications by showing that the variation in training schedule, at least within the range used here, does not seem to be a crucial element for training benefits.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesCognitionCognitive DysfunctionLearningMemory, Short-TermQuality of LifeAgedCognitive AgingFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CareTeachingTransfer, PsychologyCognitive trainingDistributed learningTransfer

Identifiers

PMID31353413
PMCPMC7265810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.