Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352899›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Metabolic derangements and reduced survival of bile-extracted Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus).

Monica Kaho Herkules Bando, O Lynne Nelson, Clark Kogan, Rance Sellon, Michelle Wiest, Heather J Bacon, Mandala Hunter-Ishikawa, Wendy Leadbeater, Koji Yamazaki, Yipeng Jin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Conscious Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements in Asiatic Black Bears (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Monica Kaho Herkules BandoVeterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, P.O. Box 646610, 100 Grimes Way, ADBF, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6610, USA. monica.bando@wsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-5569
O Lynne NelsonVeterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, P.O. Box 646610, 100 Grimes Way, ADBF, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6610, USA.
Clark KoganCenter for Interdisciplinary Statistical Education and Research (CISER), Washington State University, Abelson Suite 227, Office 221, Pullman, Washington, 99164, USA.
Rance SellonVeterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, P.O. Box 646610, 100 Grimes Way, ADBF, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6610, USA.
Michelle WiestDepartment of Statistical Science, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 1104, Moscow, ID, 83844-1104, USA.
Heather J BaconJeanne Marchig International Centre for Animal Welfare Education, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland.
Mandala Hunter-IshikawaEnsessa Kotteh Wildlife Rescue, Born Free Foundation Ethiopia, PO Box 3138/1250, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Wendy LeadbeaterVeterinary Specialty Hospital, Lucky Centre, 1/F, 165-171 Rd, Wan Chai Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.
Koji YamazakiForest Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 156-8502, Japan.
Yipeng JinClinical Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Haidian District, Yuanmingyuan Xi Lu #2, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Takeshi KomatsuKumakuma-en Kitaakita, 1-39 Ani-utto-Jinba, Kitaakita, Akita, 018-4733, Japan.
David McGeachyWildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, CW405, Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.
Washington State University · USChina Agricultural University · CNEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAKubota (Japan) · JPTokyo University of Agriculture · JPUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Idaho · US

Funding

College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University N/AMorris Animal Foundation D18ZO-401Norbury Trust N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcross China and Southeast Asia, an estimated 17,000 bears are currently farmed for bile, primarily for traditional medicines. Depending on country, bile is extracted daily via transabdominal gallbladder fistulas, indwelling catheters, or needle aspiration. Despite claims that bears do not develop adverse effects from bile extraction, health issues identified in bears removed from bile farms include bile-extraction site infections, abdominal hernias, peritonitis, cholecystitis, hepatic neoplasia, cardiac disease, skeletal abnormalities, and abnormal behaviors. We present a comprehensive assessment of the effects of bile farming by comparing serum biochemical and hematological values of bears from farms that were bile-extracted (BE) and bears from farms not bile-extracted (FNE) with bears from non-farm captive (ZOO) and free-range (FR) environments. We hypothesized BE bears would have significant laboratory abnormalities compared to all non-extracted bear groups. We also hypothesized BE bears would have reduced long-term survival compared to FNE bears despite removal from farms.

resultsBE bears exhibited the highest values and greatest variation (on a population level) in laboratory parameters compared to all non-extracted bear groups particularly for alanine transaminase, gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALKP), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine (CREA), and total white blood cell count. Significant differences were detected between bear groups when accounting for season, sex, and/or age. BE bears exhibited greater mean serum GGT compared to all non-extracted bear groups, and the odds of having elevated TBIL were 7.3 times greater for BE bears, consistent with hepatobiliary disease. Biochemical parameter elevations in BE bears persisted up to 14 years post-rescue, consistent with long-term effects of bile-extraction. BE bears that arrived with elevated CREA and ALKP had median survival times of 1 and 4 years respectively, and regardless of laboratory abnormalities, BE bears had significantly shorter survival times compared to FNE bears.

conclusionsOur results provide strong evidence that bile extraction practices not only represent a temporary constraint for bears' welfare, but confer distinct long-term adverse health consequences. Routine laboratory panels may be insensitive to detect the extent of underlying illness in BE bears as these bears have significantly reduced survival regardless of biochemical assessment compared to FNE bears.

Indexed as

BileAlkaline PhosphataseAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnimal WelfareBiliary Tract DiseasesBilirubinCreatinineFemalegamma-GlutamyltransferaseLiver DiseasesMaleSurvival AnalysisUrsidaeAlkaline PhosphataseBilirubinCreatininegamma-GlutamyltransferaseAsiatic black bearBear bile farmingBile-extractionBiochemistryHematologySurvivalUrsus thibetanus

Identifiers

PMID31352899
PMCPMC6661835
OpenAlexW2965980858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.