Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352880›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

Integrating models of human behaviour between the individual and population levels to inform conservation interventions.

Andrew D M Dobson, Emiel de Lange, Aidan Keane, Harriet Ibbett, E J Milner-Gulland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Improvements for better scaling of locally managed marine areas.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Reflections on connections.Primates; journal of primatology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Fundamental insights on when social network data are most critical for conservation planning.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D M DobsonSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.
Emiel de LangeSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.
Aidan KeaneSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.
Harriet IbbettDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
E J Milner-GullandDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation takes place within social-ecological systems, and many conservation interventions aim to influence human behaviour in order to push these systems towards sustainability. Predictive models of human behaviour are potentially powerful tools to support these interventions. This is particularly true if the models can link the attributes and behaviour of individuals with the dynamics of the social and environmental systems within which they operate. Here we explore this potential by showing how combining two modelling approaches (social network analysis, SNA, and agent-based modelling, ABM) could lead to more robust insights into a particular type of conservation intervention. We use our simple model, which simulates knowledge of ranger patrols through a hunting community and is based on empirical data from a Cambodian protected area, to highlight the complex, context-dependent nature of outcomes of information-sharing interventions, depending both on the configuration of the network and the attributes of the agents. We conclude by reflecting that both SNA and ABM, and many other modelling tools, are still too compartmentalized in application, either in ecology or social science, despite the strong methodological and conceptual parallels between their uses in different disciplines. Even a greater sharing of methods between disciplines is insufficient, however; given the impact of conservation on both the social and ecological aspects of systems (and vice versa), a fully integrated approach is needed, combining both the modelling approaches and the disciplinary insights of ecology and social science. This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking behaviour to dynamics of populations and communities: application of novel approaches in behavioural ecology to conservation'.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingSystems AnalysisCambodiaConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansModels, Theoreticalagent-based modelconservationinformation-sharinglaw enforcementpredictive modellingsocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID31352880
PMCPMC6710576
OpenAlexW2964702307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.