Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352627›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2020

The Prevalence, Anatomic Distribution and Significance of HPV Genotypes in Head and Neck Squamous Papillomas as Detected by Real-Time PCR and Sanger Sequencing.

A Trzcinska, W Zhang, M Gitman, W H Westra

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. HPV in oropharyngeal squamous papillomas: a missing link in head and neck viral pathogenesis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A TrzcinskaDepartment of Pathology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Annenberg Bldg. 15-54, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
W ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Annenberg Bldg. 15-54, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
M GitmanDepartment of Pathology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Annenberg Bldg. 15-54, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
W H WestraDepartment of Pathology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Annenberg Bldg. 15-54, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA. william.westra@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-9554
Mount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Squamous papillomas (SPs) of the head and neck are generally regarded as a human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven process, but reported rates of HPV detection vary dramatically. Moreover, they are generally considered a benign condition, but the detection of high risk HPV types is commonly reported. This latter finding is particularly disturbing to clinicians and their patients given the alarming rise of HPV-associated head and neck cancer. The capriciousness of HPV detection reflects in large part differences in methodologies. The purpose of this study was to review an institutional experience using a state of the art detection method to determine the presence, type and anatomic distribution of HPV in head and neck SPs. The surgical pathology files of the Mount Sinai Hospital were reviewed for all SPs that had undergone HPV testing between 2012 and 2018. HPV screening was performed on tissue blocks with real-time PCR using primers designed to target the L1 region of low and high-risk HPV types. Genotyping was performed on HPV positive cases. HPV detection was repeated for cases that were originally reported to be positive for high risk HPV. 134 cases had undergone HPV analysis. Of the 131 with sufficient cellular material, 2 were excluded because the HPV testing yielded inconclusive results. The remaining 129 cases were the basis of this study. Thirty-eight cases (29%) were HPV positive and 91 (71%) were negative. The most common genotype was HPV 6 (n = 27, 71%), followed by HPV 11 (n = 10, 26%). One case (1%) was HPV positive but the genotype could not be determined. Of the HPV negative cases, 3 were originally reported as HPV 16 positive but found to be HPV negative on re-review and repeat testing. SPs arising in the larynx were more likely to harbor HPV than those arising in the oral cavity and oropharynx (64% vs. 10%, p < 0.00001). Similarly, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) were much more likely to be HPV positive than solitary SPs (71% vs. 10%, p < 0.00001). Almost a third of head and neck SPs harbor HPV, but incidence is highly dependent on anatomic site. Those arising in the larynx are more prone to be HPV-driven than those arising in the oral cavity and oropharynx, particularly when occurring in the setting of RRP. High risk HPV could not be confirmed in any of the cases. Routine HPV testing as a strategy to unmask potentially malignant lesions harboring high risk HPV is not likely to be useful.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlphapapillomavirusFemaleGenotypeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomaPapillomavirus InfectionsPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Tract InfectionsHuman papillomavirusp16Recurrent respiratory papillomatosisSquamous cell papilloma

Identifiers

PMID31352627
PMCPMC7235102
OpenAlexW2966822933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.