ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Technical Developments and Initial Clinical Validation.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Novel Bioreactor Design for Non-invasive Longitudinal Monitoring of Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves in 7T MRI and Ultrasound.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Emerging Trends in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Quantitative Biomedical Imaging Applications: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The future of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: All-in-one vs. real-time (Part 1).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Review
- Dynamic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting During Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers: First Results.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Potential Clinical Applications.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Cardiac MR: From Theory to Practice.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Simultaneous multi-parametric acquisition and reconstruction techniques in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Basic concepts and status of clinical development.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Recent technologies in cardiac imaging.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Review
- Review
- Free-breathing simultaneousMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: from evolution to clinical applications.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2020Review
- Fast and accurate calculation of myocardial TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Free-running cardiac magnetic resonance fingerprinting: Joint T1/T2 map and Cine imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled non-invasive myocardial tissue characterization in a wide range of cardiovascular diseases by quantifying several tissue specific parameters such as T RECENT
findingsCardiac MRF has enabled the acquisition of co-registered T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.