SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2019
Efficacy and safety of desmopressin in women with nocturia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk analyses of nocturia on incident poor sleep and vice versa: the Nagahama study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Diagnosis and management of nocturia.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of desmopressin treatment in women with nocturia.
methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, ISI web of knowledge, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their inception date till April, 2019. The meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3. This review also stratified each outcome by dose (< 25 μg, 25 μg versus > 25 μg) to explore the differences in the dose response for orally disintegrating tablet (ODT).
resultsSeven publications with seven trials were included in this review. The methodological quality of these trials was fair, and four studies had low risk of bias. The number of nocturnal voids per night was significantly decreased by desmopressin when compared to the control [6 trials, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = 0.41, P < 0.00001], and the difference between < 25, 25 and > 25 μg dose ODT groups was also significant (P = 0.03). The duration of first sleep period was significantly increased by desmopressin [4 trials, WMD = 66.64, P < 0.00001], and the difference between these three doses ODT was not significant (P = 0.15). Overall, the risk ratios (RR) for 33% responder rate showed significance when compared with desmopressin to controls [3 trials, RR = 1.30, P = 0.0003]. The number of total adverse events was similar in both desmopressin and control groups [5 trials, RR = 0.95, P = 0.59], otherwise, showed no significant difference between different ODT dose groups (P = 0.82).
conclusionsDesmopressin had certain efficacy and adequate safety in women with nocturia. The exploration of appropriate dose for female patients, and other influential factors, such as age should be conducted and considered in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.