Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352546›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Can digital X-ray radiogrammetry be an alternative for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis of secondary low bone quality in children?

Alex D Leijten, Brieke Hampsink, Marcel Janssen, Willemijn M Klein, Jos M T Draaisma

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex D LeijtenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brieke HampsinkRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcel JanssenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Willemijn M KleinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jos M T DraaismaRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. jos.draaisma@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-6173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone quality in children is generally measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) uses BoneXpert to measure cortical bone quality on hand radiographs. This prospective study compared DXR and DXA results in children with high probability of secondary low bone quality, defined as DXA of the lumbar spine (DXA

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOsteoporosisProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityDigital X-ray radiogrammetryDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryLow bone qualityOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID31352546
PMCPMC6694095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.