Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352467›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2020

Neural responses during extinction learning predict exposure therapy outcome in phobia: results from a randomized-controlled trial.

Iris Lange, Liesbet Goossens, Stijn Michielse, Jindra Bakker, Bram Vervliet, Machteld Marcelis, Marieke Wichers, Jim van Os, Therese van Amelsvoort, Koen Schruers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fear Extinction as a Psychologist Views It.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  12. COBMC psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ambiguity drives higher-order Pavlovian learning.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stimulus-Based Extinction Generalization: Neural Correlates and Modulation by Cortisol.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mindfulness and Behavior Change.Harvard review of psychiatry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Iris LangeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. i.lange@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Liesbet GoossensDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Stijn MichielseDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-8646
Jindra BakkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bram VervlietFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Laboratory of Biological Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Machteld MarcelisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Marieke WichersDepartment of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jim van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Therese van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Koen SchruersDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLKing's College London · GBKU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extinction learning is assumed to represent a core mechanism underlying exposure therapy. Empirical evaluations of this assumption, however, are largely lacking. The current study investigated whether neural activations and self-report outcomes during extinction learning and extinction recall could specifically predict exposure therapy response in specific phobia. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, individuals with spider phobia (N = 45; female/male = 41/4) were on group basis randomly allocated to exposure therapy (n = 25; female/male = 24/1) or progressive muscle relaxation (PMR; n = 20; female/male = 17/3). Intervention effects were measured with the Fears of Spiders questionnaire. Participants also underwent a three-day fear conditioning, extinction learning, and extinction recall paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline. Extinction outcomes were self-reported fear and threat expectancy, and neural responses during conditioned stimulus processing and during extinction-related prediction errors (US omissions) in regions of interest (ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and nucleus accumbens). Results showed that exposure therapy resulted in stronger symptom reductions than PMR (Cohen's d = 0.90). Exposure therapy response was specifically predicted by prediction-error related vmPFC activation during early extinction. There were also indications vmPFC activations during conditioned safety stimulus processing at early extinction predicted therapy outcome. Neural activations during extinction recall and self-report data did however not predict therapy outcome. These findings indicate that exposure therapy may rely on neural extinction learning processes. Prediction errors are thought to drive the extinction learning process, and prediction error-related vmPFC activation specifically predicted therapy outcome. The extent to which vmPFC processes safety signals may additionally be predictive of exposure therapy response, but the specificity is less clear.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainDouble-Blind MethodExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleHumansImplosive TherapyMaleMental RecallPhobic DisordersPredictive Value of TestsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31352467
PMCPMC6969109
OpenAlexW2964719690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.