ArticleBMJ open2019
Improving access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations in Australia and Canada: protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of six complex interventions.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Profiling patterns of patient experiences of access and continuity at team-based primary healthcare clinics (Canada): a latent class analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Facilitating access to primary care for people living in socio-economically vulnerable circumstances in Belgium through community health workers: towards a conceptual model.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- "None of us are lying": an interpretive description of the search for legitimacy and the journey to access quality health services by individuals living with Long COVID.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A longitudinal multi-site evaluation of community-based partnerships: implications for researchers, funders, and communities.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Realist review of community coalitions and outreach interventions to increase access to primary care for vulnerable populations: a realist review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Strategies to Increase Access to Outpatient Physiotherapy Services: A Scoping Review.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2022Article
- Global Learning for Health Equity: A Literature Review.Annals of global health · 2022Review
- Improving primary health care through partnerships: Key insights from a cross-case analysis of multi-stakeholder partnerships in two Canadian provinces.Health science reports · 2021Article
- Improving access to primary health care: a cross-case comparison based on an a priori program theory.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Expectations and needs of socially vulnerable patients for navigational support of primary health care services.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Activating Partnership Assets to Produce Synergy in Primary Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque's conceptual framework- a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Measuring partnership synergy and functioning: Multi-stakeholder collaboration in primary health care.PloS one · 2021Article
- Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations.International journal for equity in health · 2020Review
- Does healthcare inequity reflect variations in peoples' abilities to access healthcare? Results from a multi-jurisdictional interventional study in two high-income countries.International journal for equity in health · 2020Article
- The Feasibility of a Primary Care Based Navigation Service to Support Access to Health and Social Resources: The Access to Resources in the Community (ARC) Model.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccess to primary healthcare (PHC) has a fundamental influence on health outcomes, particularly for members of vulnerable populations. Innovative Models Promoting Access-to-Care Transformation (IMPACT) is a 5-year research programme built on community-academic partnerships. IMPACT aims to design, implement and evaluate organisational innovations to improve access to appropriate PHC for vulnerable populations. Six Local Innovation Partnerships (LIPs) in three Australian states (New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and three Canadian provinces (Ontario, Quebec and Alberta) used a common approach to implement six different interventions. This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the processes, outcomes and scalability of these organisational innovations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation will use a convergent mixed-methods design involving longitudinal (pre and post) analysis of the six interventions. Study participants include vulnerable populations, PHC practices, their clinicians and administrative staff, service providers in other health or social service organisations, intervention staff and members of the LIP teams. Data were collected prior to and 3-6 months after the interventions and included interviews with members of the LIPs, organisational process data, document analysis and tools collecting the cost of components of the intervention. Assessment of impacts on individuals and organisations will rely on surveys and semistructured interviews (and, in some settings, direct observation) of participating patients, providers and PHC practices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The IMPACT research programme received initial ethics approval from St Mary's Hospital (Montreal) SMHC #13-30. The interventions received a range of other ethics approvals across the six jurisdictions. Dissemination of the findings should generate a deeper understanding of the ways in which system-level organisational innovations can improve access to PHC for vulnerable populations and new knowledge concerning improvements in PHC delivery in health service utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.