ArticleGenetics2019
Predicting Phenotypic Diversity from Molecular and Genetic Data.
Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning reveals genes impacting oxidative stress resistance across yeasts.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Sufficient principal component regression for pattern discovery in transcriptomic data.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the importance of complex phenotypes, an in-depth understanding of the combined molecular and genetic effects on a phenotype has yet to be achieved. Here, we introduce InPhenotype, a novel computational approach for complex phenotype prediction, where gene-expression data and genotyping data are integrated to yield quantitative predictions of complex physiological traits. Unlike existing computational methods, InPhenotype makes it possible to model potential regulatory interactions between gene expression and genomic loci without compromising the continuous nature of the molecular data. We applied InPhenotype to synthetic data, exemplifying its utility for different data parameters, as well as its superiority compared to current methods in both prediction quality and the ability to detect regulatory interactions of genes and genomic loci. Finally, we show that InPhenotype can provide biological insights into both mouse and yeast datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.