ArticleNeuroImage2019
Normative cerebral cortical thickness for human visual areas.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weakening of Subcortical and Strengthening of Cortical Visual Pathways Across Early Adolescence.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Congenital blindness reduces myelination in human visual cortex.Science advances · 2026Article
- Unraveling the mesoscale resting-state functional connectivity of ocular dominance columns in humans using high-resolution functional MRI.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the mesoscale resting-state functional connectivity of ocular dominance columns in humans using high-resolution functional MRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Human retinotopic mapping: From empirical to computational models of retinotopy.Journal of vision · 2025Review
- Neuronal composition of processing modules in human V1: laminar density for neuronal and non-neuronal populations and a comparison with macaque.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Associations between digital media use and brain surface structural measures in preschool-aged children.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?iScience · 2022Article
- Bringing Anatomical Information into Neuronal Network Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Cortical Thickness in Crouzon-Pfeiffer Syndrome: Findings in Relation to Primary Cranial Vault Expansion.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Influence of Processing Pipeline on Cortical Thickness Measurement.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
- Compensating cortical thickness for cortical folding-related variation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of changes in cerebral neocortical thickness often rely on small control samples for comparison with specific populations with abnormal visual systems. We present a normative dataset for FreeSurfer-derived cortical thickness across 25 human visual areas derived from 960 participants in the Human Connectome Project. Cortical thickness varies systematically across visual areas, in broad agreement with canonical visual system hierarchies in the dorsal and ventral pathways. In addition, cortical thickness estimates show consistent within-subject variability and reliability. Importantly, cortical thickness estimates in visual areas are well described by a normal distribution, making them amenable to direct statistical comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.