ReviewPharmacological research2019
Advances in exploring the therapeutic potential of marine natural products.
Review in Pharmacological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Antibacterial Properties of Marine Sponge-Derived Natural Compounds: A Systematic Review.Marine drugs · 2025Pooled it
- Biosynthetic origin of anticancer dolastatin 15 reveals a noncanonical NRPS architecture enabling 2-keto acid activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Marine-Derived Natural Products Against Flaviviruses: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Future Directions.Marine drugs · 2026Review
- Computational identification of a marine derived dual inhibitor for type 2 diabetes mellitus using integrated in silico approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Label-Free Target Discovery Strategy for Natural Active Products.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Geodiamolide A, a Marine Sponge Depsipeptide, Halts Proliferation and Triggers Cell Death in Squamous Cell Carcinoma (A431, NMSC) In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The influence of chlorogenic acid disinfection on the oral microbiota of alginate impressions.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Total Synthesis of (+)-Penicyclone A and Evaluation of Biological Activity Including Intermediate Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Unlocking potent anti-tuberculosis natural products through structure-activity relationship analysis.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Review
- Marine life as a source of anti-prostate cancer agents: an updated overview (2003-2023).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- The Cytotoxic Activity of Secondary Metabolites from Marine-DerivedMarine drugs · 2025Review
- The Mediterranean Sea on the Bench: Unveiling the Marine InvertebrateMarine drugs · 2025Article
- Polyoxygenated cembrane-type diterpenes from the Hainan soft coral Lobophytum crassum as a promising source of anticancer agents with ErbB3 and ROR1 inhibitory potential.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Chemoproteomics of Marine Natural Product Naamidine J Unveils CSE1L as a Therapeutic Target in Acute Lung Injury.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Review
- Antibacterial properties of natural products from marine fungi reported between 2012 and 2023: a review.Archives of pharmacal research · 2024Review
- Marine-Derived Phosphoeleganin and Its Semisynthetic Derivative Decrease IL6 Levels and Improve Insulin Signaling in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Plant and marine-derived natural products: sustainable pathways for future drug discovery and therapeutic development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Pro-Apoptotic Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine natural products represent novel and diverse chemotypes that serve as templates for the discovery and development of therapeutic agents with distinct mechanisms of action. These genetically encoded compounds produced by an evolutionary optimized biosynthetic machinery are usually quite complex and can be difficult to recreate in the laboratory. The isolation from the source organism results in limited amount of material; however, the development of advanced NMR technologies and dereplication strategies has enabled the structure elucidation on small scale. In order to rigorously explore the therapeutic potential of marine natural products and advance them further, the biological characterization has to keep pace with the chemical characterization. The limited marine natural product supply has been a serious challenge for thorough investigation of the biological targets. Several marine drugs have reached the markets or are in clinical trials, where those challenges have been overcome, including through the development of scalable syntheses. However, the identification of mechanisms of action of marine natural products early in the discovery process is potentially game changing, since effectively linking marine natural products to potential therapeutic applications in turn triggers motivation to tackle challenging syntheses and solve the supply problem. An increasing number of sensitive technologies and methods have been developed in recent years, some of which have been successfully applied to marine natural products, increasing the value of these compounds with respect to their biomedical utility. In this review, we discuss advances in overcoming the bottlenecks in marine natural product research, emphasizing on the development and advances of diverse target identification technologies applicable for marine natural product research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.