Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351911›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Theoretical principles of deep brain stimulation induced synaptic suppression.

AmirAli Farokhniaee, Cameron C McIntyre

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Subcortical Aphasia.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

AmirAli FarokhniaeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cameron C McIntyreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: ccm4@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Understanding the effects of deep brain stimulation on cortical processingR01NS086100 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON, TAYLOR, DAWN MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a successful clinical therapy for a wide range of neurological disorders; however, the physiological mechanisms of DBS remain unresolved. While many different hypotheses currently exist, our analyses suggest that high frequency (∼100 Hz) stimulation-induced synaptic suppression represents the most basic concept that can be directly reconciled with experimental recordings of spiking activity in neurons that are being driven by DBS inputs.

objectiveThe goal of this project was to develop a simple model system to characterize the excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSCs) and action potential signaling generated in a neuron that is strongly connected to pre-synaptic glutamatergic inputs that are being directly activated by DBS.

methodsWe used the Tsodyks-Markram (TM) phenomenological synapse model to represent depressing, facilitating, and pseudo-linear synapses driven by DBS over a wide range of stimulation frequencies. The EPSCs were then used as inputs to a leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model and we measured the DBS-triggered post-synaptic spiking activity.

resultsSynaptic suppression was a robust feature of high frequency stimulation, independent of the synapse type. As such, the TM equations were used to define alternative DBS pulsing strategies that maximized synaptic suppression with the minimum number of stimuli.

conclusionsSynaptic suppression provides a biophysical explanation to the intermittent, but still time-locked, post-synaptic firing characteristics commonly seen in DBS experimental recordings. Therefore, network models attempting to analyze or predict the effects of DBS on neural activity patterns should integrate synaptic suppression into their simulations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsDeep Brain StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsNeuronsSynapsesBasal gangliaCortexGlutamateSynapseThalamus

Identifiers

PMID31351911
PMCPMC6851468
OpenAlexW2956408057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.