Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351862›Full record

ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2019

A Pilot Study of the PD-1 Targeting Agent AMP-224 Used With Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Charalampos S Floudas, Gagandeep Brar, Donna Mabry-Hrones, Austin G Duffy, Bradford Wood, Elliot Levy, Venkatesh Krishnasamy, Suzanne Fioravanti, Cecilia M Bonilla, Melissa Walker and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  15. "Cold" colorectal cancer faces a bottleneck in immunotherapy.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charalampos S FloudasHematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Gagandeep BrarHematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Donna Mabry-HronesGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Austin G DuffyGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Bradford WoodRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Elliot LevyRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Venkatesh KrishnasamyRadiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Suzanne FioravantiGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Cecilia M BonillaHematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Melissa WalkerGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Maria Pia MorelliHematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
David E KleinerLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
William D FiggClinical Pharmacology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Tim F GretenGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Liver Cancer Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: tim.greten@nih.gov.
Changqing XieGastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: changqing.xie@nih.gov.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Sample Processing and Analytical Methods Development for New Anticancer AgentsZICSC006536 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$18.1M
Clinical protocols for the treatment of GI cancerZIABC011343 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GRETEN, TIM · 2010 to 2025
$4.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is poor. We assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the anti-programmed cell death 1 fusion protein AMP-224 in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide and stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) treatment in patients with mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifteen patients were enrolled. Six received SBRT 8 Gy on day 0 (dose level 1), whereas 9 received 8 Gy on days -2 to day 0. All received cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m

resultsTen (67%) patients completed 6 doses of AMP-224; 5 patients (33%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed; 9 patients (60%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, all Grade 1 or 2. No objective response was noted; 3 patients (20%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8 months) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-9.6 months), respectively. M2 macrophage polarization was present in the pretreatment tumor biopsy samples, but not post-treatment samples.

conclusionAMP-224 in combination with SBRT and low-dose cyclophosphamide was well tolerated, however, no significant clinical benefit was observed in patients with mCRC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPilot ProjectsPrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCyclophosphamidePDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorImmunotherapyMacrophagesPD-L2 LigandProgrammed Cell Death 1 ProteinStereotactic Radiation Therapy

Identifiers

PMID31351862
PMCPMC6884678
OpenAlexW2954253001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.