Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351766›Full record

ReviewSurgical oncology2020

Gene mutation and surgical technique: Suggestion or more?

Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Heather A Lillemoe, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05289076 (Protocol for Evaluation of Oncological Treatment in Patients With CRLM Using Zebra Fish Avatars-may This Model Improve Resection Rates and Survival in Patients With Upfront Non-resectable Metastatic Disease?), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05289076 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Protocol for Evaluation of Oncological Treatment in Patients With CRLM Using Zebra Fish Avatars-may This Model Improve Resection Rates and Survival in Patients With Upfront Non-resectable Metastatic Disease?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LinkoepingRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsColorectal Cancer Metastatic, Tumour Metastasis, Chemotherapy Effect, Tumor GrowthArmsChemotherapy drug
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology, Including Gene Alterations, in Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  5. Alteration of FBXW7 is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Innovation and Future Perspectives in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshikuni KawaguchiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Heather A LillemoeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jean-Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: jvauthey@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TRAINING OF ACADEMIC SURGICAL ONCOLOGISTST32CA009599 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ashley M Holder, Jennifer A. Wargo · 1988 to 2026
$13.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have improved long-term outcomes for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). RAS mutation status was an original focus as a molecular biomarker as it predicted treatments response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. More recently, studies have incorporated somatic mutation data in analyses pertaining to surgical outcomes and prognosis. This evidenced-based review covers the implications of somatic mutations in patients undergoing resection of CLM.

Indexed as

HepatectomyMetastasectomyClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMutationPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Smad4 ProteinTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesKRAS protein, humanPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Smad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Colorectal liver metastasisMultiple gene mutationSomatic gene mutation

Identifiers

PMID31351766
PMCPMC6980434
OpenAlexW2964198805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.