Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351479›Full record

ArticleLipids in health and disease2019

Comparison of discrimination for cardio-metabolic risk by different cut-off values of the ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol.

Ichiro Wakabayashi, Takashi Daimon

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lipids in health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hemorrhagic stroke and atherogenic markers - is there any relation?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ichiro WakabayashiDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho 1-1, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan. wakabaya@hyo-med.ac.jp.
Takashi DaimonDivision of Biostatistics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H02184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ratio of triglycerides to HDL cholesterol (TG/HDL-C ratio) is known as a good predictor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to compare discrimination for cardiovascular risk by different cut-off values of the TG/HDL-C ratio.

methodsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for the relationship between TG/HDL-C ratio and accumulation of cardio-metabolic risk factors including visceral obesity, hypertension and diabetes. Logistic regression analysis was performed for the relationships of TG/HDL-C ratio with cardio-metabolic risk factors using the cut-off values obtained by ROC analysis and conventional cut-off values (men, 3.75; women, 3.00).

resultsIn ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off values for TG/HDL-C ratio were 2.967 in men and 2.237 in women, which were much smaller than the conventional cut-of values. Odds ratios for multiple cardio-metabolic risk factors of subjects with vs. subjects without a high TG/HDL-C ratio in men and women were 5.75 (4.43-7.46) and 18.76 (10.32-34.13), respectively, by using the new cut-off values and they were 5.03 (3.96-6.39) and 16.11 (9.20-28.20), respectively, by using the conventional cut-off values. The odds ratios for visceral obesity, hypertension and diabetes were comparable when using these two different cut-off values.

conclusionCut-off values should be ideally calculated by ROC analysis. However, the discrimination power of cut-off values for the TG/HDL-C ratio calculated by ROC analysis for cardio-metabolic risk was similar to those by using the conventional cut-off values. Further studies using cardiovascular events as outcomes in the analysis may be needed to determine more suitable cut-off values of the TG/HDL-C ratio.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, HDLDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsMaleObesity, AbdominalOdds RatioRisk FactorsROC CurveTriglyceridesCholesterol, HDLTriglyceridesCardiovascular diseaseCut-off valuesMultiple risk factorsReceiver operating characteristicTriglycerides-to-HDL cholesterol ratio

Identifiers

PMID31351479
PMCPMC6661090
OpenAlexW2966114773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.