Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351103›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2019

How trait distributions evolve in populations with parametric heterogeneity.

Georgy P Karev, Artem S Novozhilov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Georgy P KarevNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: karev@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Artem S NovozhilovDepartment of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA. Electronic address: artem.novozhilov@ndus.edu.

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM000073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the problem of determining the time evolution of a trait distribution in a mathematical model of non-uniform populations with parametric heterogeneity. This means that we consider only heterogeneous populations in which heterogeneity is described by an individual specific parameter that differs in general from individual to individual, but does not change with time for the whole lifespan of this individual. Such a restriction allows obtaining a number of simple and yet important analytical results. In particular we show that initial assumptions on time-dependent behavior of various characteristics, such as the mean, variance, or coefficient of variation, restrict severely possible choices for the exact form of the trait distribution. This fact must be taken into account for both model formulation and, especially, for testing theoretical models against available real world data. We illustrate our findings by in-depth analysis of the variance evolution and specific examples from population ecology and mathematical epidemiology. We also reanalyze a well known mathematical model for gypsy moth population and show that the knowledge of how trait distributions evolve allows producing oscillatory behaviors for highly heterogeneous populations.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, TheoreticalStatistical DistributionsAnimalsMothsTreesEvolution of distributionGamma distributionHeterogeneityHeterogeneous populationsNormal distribution

Identifiers

PMID31351103
PMCPMC13312923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.