Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31351028›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2019

Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Sudheer Tungtur, Kristen M Schwingen, Joshua J Riepe, Chamitha J Weeramange, Liskin Swint-Kruse

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Amino acid substitutions at rheostat positions in the NaProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rheostat positions: A new classification of protein positions relevant to pharmacogenomics.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A clinically relevant polymorphism in the NaThe Journal of biological chemistry
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudheer TungturDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Kristen M SchwingenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Joshua J RiepeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Chamitha J WeeramangeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Liskin Swint-KruseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-5925-9741
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Expanding the utility of transcriptional bacterial computingR01GM117138 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, MATTHEW R., JOSIC, KRESIMIR · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Functional effects of exchanging domains and linkers in transcription regulatorsR01GM079423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWINT-KRUSE, LISKIN · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079423NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117138NIH HHS R01GM079423NIH HHS R01GM117138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To bridge biological and biochemical disciplines, the relationship between in vitro protein biochemical function and in vivo activity must be established. Such studies can (a) help determine whether properties measured in simple, dilute solutions extrapolate to the complex in vivo conditions and (b) illuminate cryptic biological factors that are new avenues for study. We have explored the in vivo-in vitro relationship for chimeras built from LacI/GalR transcription regulators. In prior studies of individual chimeras, amino acid changes that altered in vitro DNA binding affinity exhibited correlated changes in in vivo transcription repression. However, discrepancies arose when the two datasets were compared to each other: Although their DNA binding domains were identical and their in vitro binding affinities spanned the same range, their in vivo repression ranges differed by >50-fold. Here, we determined that the presence of endogenous ligand for one chimera further exacerbated the offset, but that different abilities to simultaneously bind and "loop" two DNA operators resolves the discrepancy. Indeed, results suggest that the lac operon can be looped by even weakly interacting repressor dimers. For looping-competent repressors, we measured in vitro binding to the secondary operator. Surprisingly, this was largely insensitive to amino acid changes in the repressor protein, which reflects altered specificity; this supports the emerging view that the locations of specificity determining positions can be unique to each protein homolog. In aggregate, this work illustrates how a comparative approach can enrich understanding of the in vivo-in vitro relationship and suggest unexpected avenues for future study.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLac RepressorsModels, MolecularDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLac RepressorsDNA operatorgalactose repressor proteinlactose repressor proteinloopingpurine repressor proteinspecificity determinant

Identifiers

PMID31351028
PMCPMC6739814
OpenAlexW2966354075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.