Trial reportAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019
Outcome of Combined Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Vitamin A in Advanced Cervical Carcinoma: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of nutritional interventions on cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Retinoids in cancer chemoprevention and therapy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Antioxidant Food Supplementation in Cancer: Lessons from Clinical Trials and Insights from Preclinical Studies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Antioxidant Strategies in Cervical Cancer-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Combating Methotrexate Resistance in Cancer Treatment: A Review on Navigating Pathways and Enhancing Its Efficacy With Fat-Soluble Vitamins.Scientifica · 2025Review
- Vitamins in Gynecologic Malignancies.Nutrients · 2024Review
- The effects of dietary supplements in patients with cervical cancer: a comprehensive systematic review.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023Review
- Role of vitamins A, C, D, E in cancer prevention and therapy: therapeutic potentials and mechanisms of action.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Evaluating Risk: Benefit Ratio of Fat-Soluble Vitamin Supplementation to SARS-CoV-2-Infected Autoimmune and Cancer Patients: Do Vitamin-Drug Interactions Exist?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Medicinal Prospects of Antioxidants From Algal Sources in Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Application value of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Retinoids: Molecular Aspects and Treatment in Premalignant Lesions and Cervical Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The latest World Health Organization (WHO) inquiry on the epidemiology of cervical cancers indicate there are approximately 528,000 new cases per year, ranking fourth after breast, colorectal and lung cancer. The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone in advanced cervical cancer is still being debated. NAC induces tumor shrinkage prior to pursuing surgery. NAC also has the benefit of sterilizing the lymph nodes and parametria, thereby lowering the need for adjuvant therapy after surgery. This research aims to determine the impact on the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma with NAC, with the additional provision of Vitamin A during treatment to assess the factors that could affect the outcome of clinical treatment. Methodology: The research methodology and design of this study is a randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the effects of treatment with NAC and treatment with NAC + Vitamin A, in advanced cervical carcinoma. Both study groups received treatments consisting of a regime of cisplatin and paclitaxel. The study was conducted at the General Hospital of Dr. Mohammad Hoesin. The total number of patients recruited for the trial was 30 with 15 patients per treatment arm. One group received NAC consisting of cisplatin and paclitaxel and the remaining 15 patients received NAC + Vitamin A. Results: The addition of Vitamin A was found to be much better in influencing the clinical response in the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma, although this was not statistically significant. However, a larger sample size with the reported proportion of higher positive outcome for NAC + Vitamin A may be statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on the results, Vitamin A supplementation in the treatment of advanced cervical carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy may play a crucial role in the treatment of cervical carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.