ArticleBiometrics2020
Building generalized linear models with ultrahigh dimensional features: A sequentially conditional approach.
Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-stage subsampling variable selection for sparse high-dimensional generalized linear models.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Quantile forward regression for high-dimensional survival data.Lifetime data analysis · 2023Article
- Consistent Estimation of Generalized Linear Models with High Dimensional Predictors via Stepwise Regression.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conditional screening approaches have emerged as a powerful alternative to the commonly used marginal screening, as they can identify marginally weak but conditionally important variables. However, most existing conditional screening methods need to fix the initial conditioning set, which may determine the ultimately selected variables. If the conditioning set is not properly chosen, the methods may produce false negatives and positives. Moreover, screening approaches typically need to involve tuning parameters and extra modeling steps in order to reach a final model. We propose a sequential conditioning approach by dynamically updating the conditioning set with an iterative selection process. We provide its theoretical properties under the framework of generalized linear models. Powered by an extended Bayesian information criterion as the stopping rule, the method will lead to a final model without the need to choose tuning parameters or threshold parameters. The practical utility of the proposed method is examined via extensive simulations and analysis of a real clinical study on predicting multiple myeloma patients' response to treatment based on their genomic profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.