Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350840›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2019

The Internet-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool: System Design and Feasibility Study.

Pegah Hafiz, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, Lars Vedel Kessing, Andreas Elleby Jespersen, Kia Obenhausen, Lorant Gulyas, Katarzyna Zukowska, Jakob Eyvind Bardram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Reliability and Validity of a Home-Based Self-Administered Computerized Test of Learning and Memory Using Speech Recognition.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pegah HafizDigital Health Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2998-9356
Kamilla Woznica MiskowiakDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-1384
Lars Vedel KessingCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre, Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-9436
Andreas Elleby JespersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-0555
Kia ObenhausenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-9545
Lorant GulyasCopenhagen Center for Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-1367
Katarzyna ZukowskaCopenhagen Center for Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-4784
Jakob Eyvind BardramDigital Health Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1390-8758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent cognitive impairment is prevalent in unipolar and bipolar disorders and is associated with decreased quality of life and psychosocial dysfunction. The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP) test is a validated paper-and-pencil instrument for the assessment of cognition in affective disorders. However, there is no digital cognitive screening tool for the brief and accurate assessment of cognitive impairments in this patient group.

objectiveIn this paper, we present the design process and feasibility study of the internet-based cognitive assessment tool (ICAT) that is designed based on the cognitive tasks of the SCIP. The aims of this feasibility study were to perform the following tasks among healthy individuals: (1) evaluate the usability of the ICAT, (2) investigate the feasibility of the ICAT as a patient-administered cognitive assessment tool, and (3) examine the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for the assessment of verbal recall.

methodsThe ICAT was developed in a user-centered design process. The cognitive measures of the ICAT were immediate and delayed recall, working memory, and psychomotor speed. Usability and feasibility studies were conducted separately with 2 groups of healthy individuals (N=21 and N=19, respectively). ICAT tests were available in the English and Danish languages. The participants were asked to fill in the post study system usability questionnaire (PSSUQ) upon completing the ICAT test. Verbal recall in the ICAT was assessed using ASR, and the performance evaluation criterion was word error rate (WER). A Pearson 2-tailed correlation analysis significant at the .05 level was applied to investigate the association between the SCIP and ICAT scores.

resultsThe overall psychometric factors of PSSUQ for both studies gave scores above 4 (out of 5). The analysis of the feasibility study revealed a moderate to strong correlation between the total scores of the SCIP and ICAT (r=0.63; P=.009). There were also moderate to strong correlations between the SCIP and ICAT subtests for immediate verbal recall (r=0.67; P=.002) and psychomotor speed (r=0.71; P=.001). The associations between the respective subtests for working memory, executive function, and delayed recall, however, were not statistically significant. The corresponding WER for English and Danish responses were 17.8% and 6.3%, respectively.

conclusionsThe ICAT is the first digital screening instrument modified from the SCIP using Web-based technology and ASR. There was good accuracy of the ASR for verbal memory assessment. The moderate correlation between the ICAT and SCIP scores suggests that the ICAT is a valid tool for assessing cognition, although this should be confirmed in a larger study with greater statistical power. Taken together, the ICAT seems to be a valid Web-based cognitive assessment tool that, after some minor modifications and further validation, may be used to screen for cognitive impairment in clinical settings.

Indexed as

bipolar disordercognitive impairmentscomputer softwaredepressionexecutive functionmemoryneuropsychological testsscreeningspeech recognition software

Identifiers

PMID31350840
PMCPMC6688443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.