ArticleHuman brain mapping2019
A difference degree test for comparing brain networks.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Bayesian networks for neural information flow: evaluation of continuous and discrete scoring metrics.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- fMRI-based data-driven brain parcellation using independent component analysis.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2025Article
- Characterization of Resting-State Functional Connectivity Changes in Hypertension by a Modified Difference Degree Test.Brain connectivity · 2023Article
- BrainGB: A Benchmark for Brain Network Analysis With Graph Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023Article
- Extracting brain disease-related connectome subgraphs by adaptive dense subgraph discovery.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Semi-parametric Bayes regression with network-valued covariates.Machine learning · 2022Article
- Simultaneous differential network analysis and classification for matrix-variate data with application to brain connectivity.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- FBNetGen: Task-aware GNN-based fMRI Analysis via Functional Brain Network Generation.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2022Article
- Acupuncture Regulates Symptoms of Parkinson's DiseaseFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Statistical and Machine Learning Link Selection Methods for Brain Functional Networks: Review and Comparison.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Bayesian Joint Modeling of Multiple Brain Functional Networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021Article
- Functional interactions in patients with hemianopia: A graph theory-based connectivity study of resting fMRI signal.PloS one · 2020Article
- A difference degree test for comparing brain networks.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, there has been a proliferation of methods investigating functional connectivity as a biomarker for mental disorders. Typical approaches include massive univariate testing at each edge or comparisons of network metrics to identify differing topological features. Limitations of these methods include low statistical power due to the large number of comparisons and difficulty attributing overall differences in networks to local variation. We propose a method to capture the difference degree, which is the number of edges incident to each region in the difference network. Our difference degree test (DDT) is a two-step procedure for identifying brain regions incident to a significant number of differentially weighted edges (DWEs). First, we select a data-adaptive threshold which identifies the DWEs followed by a statistical test for the number of DWEs incident to each brain region. We achieve this by generating an appropriate set of null networks which are matched on the first and second moments of the observed difference network using the Hirschberger-Qi-Steuer algorithm. This formulation permits separation of the network's true topology from the nuisance topology induced by the correlation measure that alters interregional connectivity in ways unrelated to brain function. In simulations, the proposed approach outperforms competing methods in detecting differentially connected regions of interest. Application of DDT to a major depressive disorder dataset leads to the identification of brain regions in the default mode network commonly implicated in this ruminative disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.