Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350786›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

A difference degree test for comparing brain networks.

Ixavier A Higgins, Suprateek Kundu, Ki Sueng Choi, Helen S Mayberg, Ying Guo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acupuncture Regulates Symptoms of Parkinson's DiseaseFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Bayesian Joint Modeling of Multiple Brain Functional Networks.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ixavier A HigginsDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Suprateek KunduDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ki Sueng ChoiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Helen S MaybergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ying GuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-3934-3097

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Special Scientific Procedures: Statistical Modeling CoreP50MH077083 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI KUTNER, MICHAEL HENRY · 2006 to 2010
$9.3M
Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Complex, Multi-dimensional Data from Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Mental Health StudiesR01MH118771 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Method Development of Agreement Measures and Applications in Mental HealthR01MH079448 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, MANATUNGA, AMITA K. · 2008 to 2016
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIH HHS P50 MH077083NIH HHS R01MH079448NIH HHS R01MH105561NIH HHS UL1TR002378NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH077083NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079448NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been a proliferation of methods investigating functional connectivity as a biomarker for mental disorders. Typical approaches include massive univariate testing at each edge or comparisons of network metrics to identify differing topological features. Limitations of these methods include low statistical power due to the large number of comparisons and difficulty attributing overall differences in networks to local variation. We propose a method to capture the difference degree, which is the number of edges incident to each region in the difference network. Our difference degree test (DDT) is a two-step procedure for identifying brain regions incident to a significant number of differentially weighted edges (DWEs). First, we select a data-adaptive threshold which identifies the DWEs followed by a statistical test for the number of DWEs incident to each brain region. We achieve this by generating an appropriate set of null networks which are matched on the first and second moments of the observed difference network using the Hirschberger-Qi-Steuer algorithm. This formulation permits separation of the network's true topology from the nuisance topology induced by the correlation measure that alters interregional connectivity in ways unrelated to brain function. In simulations, the proposed approach outperforms competing methods in detecting differentially connected regions of interest. Application of DDT to a major depressive disorder dataset leads to the identification of brain regions in the default mode network commonly implicated in this ruminative disorder.

Indexed as

ConnectomeNeural Networks, ComputerAdultComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNerve Netbrain connectivitydifference degreedifference networkgraph theorynetwork testtopological measure

Identifiers

PMID31350786
PMCPMC6865740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.