Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350728›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2019

Survival Analysis in Patients with Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma Treated with Avelumab.

Tereza Lanitis, Irina Proskorovsky, Apoorva Ambavane, Matthias Hunger, Ying Zheng, Murtuza Bharmal, Hemant Phatak

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current Perspectives of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hepatotoxicity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tereza LanitisEvidera, London, UK. Tereza.Lanitis@evidera.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-8843
Irina ProskorovskyEvidera, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Apoorva AmbavaneEvidera, London, UK.
Matthias HungerMapi, an ICON plc company, Munich, Germany.
Ying ZhengEMD Serono Inc., Rockland, MA, USA.
Murtuza BharmalMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Hemant PhatakEMD Serono Inc., Rockland, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComplex underlying risk functions associated with immuno-oncology treatments have led to exploration of different methods (parametric survival, spline, landmark, and cure-fraction models) to estimate long-term survival outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine differences in estimated short- and long-term survival in previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) patients receiving avelumab, when using alternative extrapolation approaches.

methodsEfficacy data from the phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (part A) with at least 12 months of follow-up were analyzed. Standard parametric survival analyses and analyses of overall survival (OS) as a function of surrogate outcomes comprised of response (landmark analyses) and progression-free survival plus post-progression survival (PFS + PPS) were used to project OS. Overall survival throughout lifetime was projected and compared with the observed OS data with at least 24 months of follow-up.

resultsEstimated OS from all three approaches provided a good fit to the observed OS curve from at least 12 months of follow-up. However, performance compared with OS data from at least 24 months showed that the landmark approach followed by PFS + PPS provided a better fit to the data as compared to standard parametric analysis. Mean life expectancy estimated with avelumab was 2.48 years with best-fitting parametric function (a log-normal distribution), 3.15 years with the landmark approach, and 3.54 years with PFS + PPS.

conclusionAlthough standard parametric survival analysis may provide a good fit to short-term survival, it appears to underestimate the long-term survival benefits associated with avelumab in mMCC. Extrapolations based on surrogate outcomes of response or progression predict OS outcomes from longer follow-up better and appear to provide more clinically plausible projections.

fundingEMD Serono Inc, Rockland, MA, a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Indexed as

Progression-Free SurvivalAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarcinoma, Merkel CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRisk AssessmentSkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedavelumabAvelumabExtrapolationImmuno-oncologyLandmark analysesMerkel cell carcinomaOverall survivalPost-progression survivalStandard parametric analysis

Identifiers

PMID31350728
PMCPMC6822847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.