Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350681›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2019

The use of mobile technology and peer navigation to promote adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivorship care: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Jacqueline N Casillas, Lindsay F Schwartz, Catherine M Crespi, Patricia A Ganz, Katherine L Kahn, Margaret L Stuber, Roshan Bastani, Faisal Alquaddomi, Deborah L Estrin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among females living in the rural Midwest.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Online support needs and preferences for survivors of testicular cancer: a qualitative descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Diet in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer and cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. "I had no idea what to expect": adolescent and young adults with cancer identify opportunities for patient-centered anticipatory guidance through narrative writing.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacqueline N CasillasDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, A2-410 MDCC, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1752, USA. jcasillas@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-1662
Lindsay F SchwartzDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, A2-410 MDCC, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1752, USA.
Catherine M CrespiDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Patricia A GanzCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Katherine L KahnDepartment of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Margaret L StuberDepartment of Psychiatry, Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Roshan BastaniCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Faisal AlquaddomiDepartment of Computer Science, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Deborah L EstrinDepartment of Computer Science, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Robert Damoiseaux · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA016042NCI NIH HHS NOT-CA-10-026NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience unique barriers that compromise receipt of survivorship care; therefore, development of innovative educational interventions to improve rates of AYA survivorship care is needed. The efficacy of text-messaging and peer navigation interventions was compared to standard-of-care survivorship educational materials to increase AYAs' (1) late effects knowledge and (2) knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy towards seeking survivor-focused care.

methodsThis was a three-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial with one control group and two intervention groups. The control group received current standard-of-care educational materials. One intervention group participated in a text-messaging program, and the second participated in a peer navigator program. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. Study outcome variables were quantified using Fisher exact tests, two-sample t tests, exact McNemar tests, conditional logistic regression models, and analysis of covariance.

resultsSeventy-one survivors completed the study (control n = 24; text-messaging n = 23; peer navigation n = 24). Late effects knowledge was high at baseline for all groups. The text-messaging group had increased survivorship care knowledge compared to the control group (p < 0.05); the peer navigation group had increased survivorship care self-efficacy compared to the control group; p < 0.05. Both intervention groups showed increased attitudes towards seeking survivor-focused care compared to the control group (text-messaging p < 0.05; peer navigation p < 0.05).

conclusionsEach intervention demonstrated significant benefits compared to the control group. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Given the preliminary effectiveness of both interventions, each can potentially be used in the future by AYA cancer survivors to educate and empower them to obtain needed survivorship care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPalliative CarePeer GroupSurvivorshipAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient NavigationProspective StudiesPsychosocial Support SystemsAdolescents and young adultsCancer survivorsCancer survivorship carePeer navigationText-messaging

Identifiers

PMID31350681
PMCPMC7045289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.