Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350653›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.

Claude M Setodji, John D Peipert, Ron D Hays

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mild to moderate cognitive impairment does not bias the Geriatric Depression Scale in a large US sample of older adults.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claude M SetodjiRAND Corporation, 4570, 5th Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2665, USA. setodji@rand.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-422X
John D PeipertDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Ron D HaysRAND Corporation, 4570, 5th Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2665, USA.
RAND Corporation · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Continuation of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems CAHPS IVU18HS016980 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2007 to 2016
$14.7M
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems V (CAHPS V)U18HS025920 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2017 to 2021
$5.6M
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U18HS016978Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U18HS016980AHRQ HHS U18 HS016978AHRQ HHS U18 HS016980AHRQ HHS U18 HS025920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnd-stage renal disease patients' experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS®) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups.

methodsThe ICH-CAHPS survey was administered to 1454 patients from 32 dialysis facilities. For the characteristics compared, the sample had 756 participants younger than 65 years old, 739 men, 516 Black, 567 White, and 970 with less than high school diploma. Three different patient experience constructs were studied including nephrologist's communication and caring, quality of care and operations, and providing information to patients. We used item response theory analysis to examine the possibility of differential item functioning (DIF) by patient age, gender, race, and education separately after controlling for the other DIF characteristics and additional confounding variables including survey mode, mental, and general health status as well as duration on dialysis.

resultsThe three constructs studied were unidimensional and no major DIF was observed on the composites. Some non-equivalences were observed when confounders were not controlled for, suggesting that such covariates can be important factors in understanding the possibility of disparity in patients' experience.

conclusionsThe ICH-CAHPS is a promising survey to elicit hemodialysis patients' experience that has good psychometric properties and provides a standardized tool for assessing age, gender, race, or education disparity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHealth StatusHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeCAHPS In-Center Hemodialysis (ICH) SurveyDifferential item functioningHealth care disparitiesItem response theoryMeasurement equivalencePatient experiences of care

Identifiers

PMID31350653
PMCPMC6810787
OpenAlexW2964825774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.