Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350619›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2019

Histopathological characterization of Toxocara canis- and T. cati-induced neurotoxocarosis in the mouse model.

Andrea Springer, Lea Heuer, Elisabeth Janecek-Erfurth, Andreas Beineke, Christina Strube

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2022
    Article
  12. Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. "Begging the Question"-DoesPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea SpringerInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Lea HeuerInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Elisabeth Janecek-ErfurthInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Andreas BeinekeDepartment of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Christina StrubeInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany. christina.strube@tiho-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infective larvae of Toxocara canis and T. cati, the common roundworms of dogs and cats, may invade the central nervous system of paratenic hosts, including humans, causing neurotoxocarosis (NT). Previous studies on NT in the model organism "mouse" have indicated distinct differences between T. canis and T. cati regarding larval migration patterns as well as the severity of clinical symptoms and behavioural alterations. The objective of the present study was to provide an extensive characterization of the underlying histopathological alterations, comparing T. canis- and T. cati-induced changes in different brain areas over the course of murine infection. Four histological sections of five brains each of T. canis- and T. cati-infected as well as uninfected C57Bl/6 mice were investigated 7, 14, 28, 42, 70 and 98 days post infection (dpi), while brains of T. cati-infected and control mice were also available 120 and 150 dpi. In addition to haematoxylin-eosin and luxol fast blue-cresyl violet staining, immunohistochemistry was employed to study microglia/macrophage cell morphology and to detect accumulation of β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP) as an indicator of axonal damage. Haemorrhages, eosinophilic vasculitis and activated microglia/macrophages were detected in both infection groups starting 7 dpi, followed by eosinophilic meningitis in cerebra as from 14 dpi. Overall, little differences in the proportion of animals affected by these alterations were found between the two infection groups. In contrast, the proportion of animals displaying β-APP accumulation was significantly higher in the T. canis than T. cati group as from 28 dpi regarding the cerebrum as well as at 98 dpi regarding the cerebellum. In T. canis-infected mice, myelinophagic microglia/macrophages ("gitter cells") appeared as from 14 dpi, whereas these were first observed at 70 dpi in T. cati-infected animals. The proportion of animals displaying demyelination and/or gitter cells in the cerebrum was significantly higher in the T. canis than T. cati group as from 28 dpi, and at 28 and 42 dpi regarding the cerebellum. Earlier and more severe neurodegeneration during T. canis- than T. cati-induced NT, especially in the cerebrum, may explain the differences in behavioural alterations observed in previous studies. In addition to differences in larval migration preferences, immunological processes may contribute to these patterns, which warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLarvaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLToxocara canisToxocariasisToxoplasmosis, CerebralAmyloid beta-PeptidesDemyelinationNeurodegenerationNeurotoxocarosisRoundwormsZoonosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.