ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Over-the-scope clip management of non-acute, full-thickness gastrointestinal defects.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic closure techniques of bariatric surgery complications: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Endoscopic management of low output recurrent colonic fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Endoscopic management of refractory leak and gastro-cutaneous fistula after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Interventional Endoscopy for the Management of Post-Surgical Leaks and Fistulas: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforations and leaks: Why, when, and how?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Managing Leaks and Fistulas After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Challenges and Solutions.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Injection tip method to improve poor visibility during over-the-scope clip procedure.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic tissue approximation in clinical practice and the OverStitch device: a narrative review.Annals of esophagus · 2023Article
- Smart surgical sutures using soft artificial muscles.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Gastrointestinal tract injuries after thermal ablative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal leaks and fistulae: What option do we have?World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Over-the-Scope-Clips Can Be Fired Safely Over a Guidewire: Proof of Concept in an Ex-Vivo Porcine Model.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic management of full-thickness gastrointestinal tract defects (FTGID) has become an attractive management strategy, as it avoids the morbidity of surgery. We have previously described the short-term outcomes of over-the-scope clip management of 22 patients with non-acute FTGID. This study updates our prior findings with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period.
methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. All patients undergoing over-the-scope clip management of FTGID between 2013 and 2019 were identified. Acute perforations immediately managed and FTGID requiring endoscopic suturing were excluded. Patient demographics, endoscopic adjunct therapies, number of endoscopic interventions, and need for operative management were evaluated. Success was strictly defined as complete FTGID closure.
resultsWe identified 92 patients with 117 FTGID (65 fistulae and 52 leaks); 27.2% had more than one FTGID managed simultaneously. The OTSC device (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tubingen, Germany) was utilized in all cases. Additional closure attempts were required in 22.2% of defects. With a median follow-up period of 5.5 months, overall defect closure success rate was 66.1% (55.0% fistulae vs. 79.6% leaks, p = 0.007). There were four mortalities from causes unrelated to the FTGID. Only 14.9% of patients with FTGID underwent operative management. There were no complications related to endoscopic intervention and no patients required urgent surgical intervention.
conclusionsOver-the-scope clip management of FTGID represents a safe alternative to potentially morbid operative intervention. When strictly defining success as complete closure of all FTGID, endoscopy was successful in 64.4% of patients with only a small minority of patients ultimately requiring surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31350610What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.