ReviewPractical neurology2019
Language and language disorders: neuroscience to clinical practice.
Review in Practical neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical speech envelope tracking reflects lesion-symptom profiles in post-stroke aphasia.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Co-Designing Aphasia Services: Evaluation of Involvement and Processes to Support Inclusion of People With Post Stroke Aphasia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Subsequent psychiatric disorders in attention deficit and hyperactivity children receiving speech therapy.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Early subacute frontal callosal microstructure and language outcomes after stroke.Brain communications · 2025Article
- The Telephone Language Screener (TLS): standardization of a novel telephone-based screening test for language impairment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Language and Communication Interventions in People with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The volume and the distribution of premorbid white matter hyperintensities: Impact on post-stroke aphasia.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Optimizing Management with a Multidisciplinary Approach.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Therapies and Challenges in the Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation Arena: Current and Future Prospects.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Early Subacute White Matter Hyperintensities and Recovery of Language After Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023Article
- Rapid Interactions of Widespread Brain Networks Characterize Semantic Cognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Using experience-based codesign to coproduce aphasia rehabilitation services: study protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language disorders are common in neurological practice but their accurate recognition and description can be challenging. In this review, we summarise the major landmarks in the understanding of language disorders and the organisation of language in the brain. We describe approaches to assessing language disorders at the bedside or in the clinic as well as the treatment and rehabilitation of aphasia. Finally, we describe how the field of neuroscience is providing new computational and neuroscientific approaches to study the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation of aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.