Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350241›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for a longitudinal study to evaluate the use of tenofovir-based PrEP for safer conception and pregnancy among women in South Africa.

Lynn T Matthews, Manjeetha Jaggernath, Yolandie Kriel, Patricia M Smith, Kasey O'Neil, Jessica E Haberer, Craig Hendrix, Jared M Baeten, Norma C Ware, Kathleen Wirth and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03194308 (Safer Conception for Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03194308 phase4completednot on this map

Safer Conception for Women: PrEP Uptake/Adherence to Reduce Periconception HIV Risk for South African Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2017 to 2021Enrolled330ConditionsHIV Prevention, ConceptionArmsPrEP for Safer Conception
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lynn T MatthewsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-6328
Manjeetha JaggernathDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, MatCH Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Yolandie KrielDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, MatCH Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Patricia M SmithDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Kasey O'NeilCenter for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica E HabererCenter for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Craig HendrixDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Norma C WareDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kathleen WirthDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina PsarosDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
David R BangsbergDean's Office, Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jennifer A SmitDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, MatCH Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

PrEP Uptake/Adherence to Reduce Periconception HIV Risk for South African WomenR01MH108412 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MATTHEWS, LYNN T · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Periconception HIV risk reduction for HIV-discordant couples in UgandaK23MH095655 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MATTHEWS, LYNN T · 2011 to 2015
$854k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH095655NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen who choose to conceive a baby with a partner living with HIV or a partner whose HIV serostatus is unknown in HIV-endemic settings need prevention strategies to mitigate HIV acquisition during conception and pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a single-arm longitudinal study offering oral tenofovirdisoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for periconception use to 350 HIV-uninfected women in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PrEP is offered as part of woman-centred safer conception programme that promotes couples-based HIV counselling and testing, antiretroviral therapy for partners who are HIV-infected, treatment for sexually transmitted infections and safer conception strategies, such as limiting condomless sex to peak fertility. We enrol HIV-uninfected women who are not currently pregnant, in a stable relationship (≥6 months) with a partner living with HIV or of unknown serostatus, and personal or partner plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months. We follow enrolled women for 12 months. Women who become pregnant are followed through pregnancy outcome, independent of their decisions regarding PrEP use. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the uptake of and adherence to PrEP during the periconception period and pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include the uptake of other safer conception strategies. We also measure clinical outcomes including HIV seroconversion rates and pregnancy and infant outcomes. Finally, we will explore conduct and evaluate qualitative interviews in 25 participants to further inform our conceptual framework for periconception PrEP uptake and adherence among HIV-exposed women in South Africa. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of the Witwatersrand (Johannesburg, South Africa) and the Institutional Review Board of Partners Healthcare (Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Study findings will be made available to interested participants. Results will be presented to local health officials and stakeholders at meetings. Investigators will share the results at meetings and in manuscripts. De-identified quantitative data will be made available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol is registered with the South African Health Products Regulatory Agency (SAHPRA, formerly known as the Medicine Controls Council, MCC#20170131) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03194308); Pre-results.

Indexed as

FertilizationHIVMedication AdherenceAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansIncidencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSafe SexSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsTenofoviradherenceHIV preventionPmtct/emtctpregnancyprepsafer conception

Identifiers

PMID31350241
PMCPMC6661571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.