Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31349872›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2019

Clinical impact of variability on CT radiomics and suggestions for suitable feature selection: a focus on lung cancer.

Seung-Hak Lee, Hwan-Ho Cho, Ho Yun Lee, Hyunjin Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CT-based radiomics model to predict platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multicentre study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of the association between vestibular schwannoma and hearing status using a newly developed radiomics technique.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  12. Improved Prognosis of Treatment Failure in Cervical Cancer with Nontumor PET/CT Radiomics.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seung-Hak LeeDepartement of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea.
Hwan-Ho ChoDepartement of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea.
Ho Yun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea. hoyunlee96@gmail.com.
Hyunjin ParkCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, 16419, South Korea. hyunjinp@skku.edu.

Funding

IITP grant funded by the AI Graduate School Support Program 2019-0-00421Institute for Basic Science IBS-R015-D1Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI17C0086Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea IITP-2018-2018-0-01798National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2016R1A2B4013046National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017M2A2A7A02018568National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2019R1H1A2079721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics suffers from feature reproducibility. We studied the variability of radiomics features and the relationship of radiomics features with tumor size and shape to determine guidelines for optimal radiomics study.

methodsWe dealt with 260 lung nodules (180 for training, 80 for testing) limited to 2 cm or less. We quantified how voxel geometry (isotropic/anisotropic) and the number of histogram bins, factors commonly adjusted in multi-center studies, affect reproducibility. First, features showing high reproducibility between the original and isotropic transformed voxel settings were identified. Second, features showing high reproducibility in various binning settings were identified. Two hundred fifty-two features were computed and features with high intra-correlation coefficient were selected. Features that explained nodule status (benign/malignant) were retained using the least absolute shrinkage selector operator. Common features among different settings were identified, and the final features showing high reproducibility correlated with nodule status were identified. The identified features were used for the random forest classifier to validate the effectiveness of the features. The properties of the uncalculated feature were inspected to suggest a tentative guideline for radiomics studies.

resultsNine features showing high reproducibility for both the original and isotropic voxel settings were selected and used to classify nodule status (AUC 0.659-0.697). Five features showing high reproducibility among different binning settings were selected and used in classification (AUC 0.729-0.748). Some texture features are likely to be successfully computed if a nodule was larger than 1000 mm

conclusionsFeatures showing high reproducibility among different settings correlated with nodule status were identified.

Indexed as

HumansLung NeoplasmsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyFeature reproducibilityGuideline for multi-center analysisPrecision medicineRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID31349872
PMCPMC6660971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.