ArticleBMC research notes2019
Re-recruiting postpartum women living with HIV into a follow-up study in Cape Town, South Africa.
Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants and Strategies for Implementation of an Adapted Data to Care Vertical HIV Prevention Intervention in a South African Context.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Characterizing participants who respond to text, email, phone calls, or postcards in a SARS-CoV-2 prevalence study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Observational
- Maternal retention and early infant HIV diagnosis in a prospective cohort study of HIV-positive women and their children in Malawi.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2023Observational
- Leaving no woman or girl behind? Inclusion and participation in digital maternal health programs in sub-Saharan Africa.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of HIV-Infected Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy After Transferring Out of an Integrated Maternal and Child Health Service in South Africa.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecruitment and retention present major challenges to longitudinal research in maternal and child health, yet there are few insights into optimal strategies that can be employed in low-resource settings. Following prior participation in a longitudinal study following women living with HIV through pregnancy and breastfeeding in Cape Town, women were re-contacted at least 18 months after the last study contact and were invited to attend an additional follow-up visit. We describe lessons learnt and offer recommendations for a multiphase recruitment approach.
resultsUsing telephone calls, home visits, clinic tracing and Facebook/WhatsApp messages, we located 387 of the 463 eligible women and successfully enrolled 353 (91% of those contacted). Phone calls were the most successful strategy, yielding 67% of enrolments. Over half of the women had changed their contact information since participation in the previous study. We recommend that researchers collect multiple contact details and use several recruitment strategies in parallel from the start of a study. Participants in longitudinal studies may require frequent contact to update contact information, particularly in settings where mobility is common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.