Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31349806›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2019

Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography angiography for choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rui Wang, Zhenzhen Liang, Xin Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Quantitative analysis of retinal and choroidal microvascular parameters using optical coherence tomography angiography in children with nephrotic syndrome: a pilot study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui WangEpidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Zhenzhen LiangDepartment of NHC Key Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Xin LiuEpidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. liuxinjlu01@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-3274

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0108602The Technology Project of the Department of Health of Jilin Province 20165044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), an innovative image technique, renders visualization of ocular neovascularization through non-invasive means, which has been applied in recent years. Therefore, the present study was designed to assess the diagnostic value of OCTA in detecting the choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

methodsIn brief, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from January 2014 to June 2019. Afterwards, a meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled diagnostic accuracy in a random-effects model using STATA 15.1 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Quality Assessment of diagnostic Accuracy Version 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias of each study by Revman 5.3 software. In addition, a meta-regression model was further conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

resultsAccording to pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 eligible studies were enrolled in this study. A total of 447 CNV eyes and 414 non-CNV eyes were included to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of OCTA. As a result, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC-AUC) were 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.92), 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-0.99), 32.7 (95% CI 10.1-105.5), 0.13 (95% CI 0.08-0.20), 252 (95% CI 63-1011) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97), respectively.

conclusionsIn summary, we demonstrated that OCTA was of high diagnostic value for detecting intraocular CNV.

Indexed as

ChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveTomography, Optical CoherenceChoroidal neovascularizationDiagnosisMeta-analysisOptical coherence tomography angiography

Identifiers

PMID31349806
PMCPMC6660939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.