Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31349668›Full record

SynthesisCells2019

Prognostic Value of miRNAs in Head and Neck Cancers: A Comprehensive Systematic and Meta-Analysis.

Chellan Kumarasamy, Madurantakam Royam Madhav, Shanthi Sabarimurugan, Sunil Krishnan, Siddhartha Baxi, Ajay Gupta, K M Gothandam, Rama Jayaraj

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. New insights into RAS in head and neck cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Mapping Research on miRNAs in Cancer: A Global Data Analysis and Bibliometric Profiling Analysis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Journal of Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chellan KumarasamyNorth Terrace Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Madurantakam Royam MadhavSchool of Bio Science and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.
Shanthi SabarimuruganSchool of Bio Science and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.
Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Siddhartha BaxiJohn Flynn Private Hospital, Genesis Cancer Care, 42 Inland Drive, Tugun, Queensland 4224, Australia.
Ajay GuptaMedical Oncology P-41, South Extension Part 2, New Delhi 110049, India.
K M GothandamSchool of Bio Science and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.
Rama JayarajCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Yellow 1.1.05, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Charles Darwin University, Australia. Rama.Jayaraj@cdu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common type of cancer across the globe, with more than 300,000 deaths each year, globally. However, there are currently no standardised molecular markers that assist in determining HNC prognosis. The literature for this systematic review and meta-analysis were sourced from multiple bibliographic databases. This review followed PRISMA guidelines. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was selected as the effect size metric to independently assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and prognosis. Subgroup analysis was performed for individual highly represented miRNA. A total of 6843 patients across 50 studies were included in the systematic review and 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies across 12 countries were assessed, with China representing 36.7% of all included studies. The analysis of the survival endpoints of OS and DFS were conducted separately, with the overall pooled effect size (HR) for each being 1.825 (95% CI 1.527-2.181;

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisPublication BiasRNA InterferenceBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAshead and neck cancermeta-analysismicroRNAsprognosissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31349668
PMCPMC6721479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.