ArticlePLoS genetics2019
The presence and impact of reference bias on population genomic studies of prehistoric human populations.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
134 citing papers in PubMed.
- T2T-CHM13 reference genome reduces mapping bias and enhances alignment accuracy at disease-associated variants.iScience · 2026Article
- Population genomics, demography, and circum-Baltic connectivity of Early Medieval southwestern Finland.Genome biology · 2026Article
- On the ancestry and evolution of the extinct dire wolf.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Beyond the linear genome: how reference bias threatens preventive medicine and geroscience.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Deep Genomic Differentiation and Highly Differentiated Segments Between a Composite Domestic Cattle Population and Yak from the Ili River Valley and Other Xinjiang Regions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Insights into human adaptation from ancient DNA.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- On the Edge of Empire: Paleogenomic Insights into Roman Dacia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- PSMC-FAC: Automated Optimization of False-Negative Rate Corrections for Low-Coverage PSMC-Based Demographic Inference.Biology · 2026Article
- Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference.Genome research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the performance of ancient DNA genetic relatedness estimation methods using high-fidelity pedigree simulations.Genome biology · 2026Article
- The reference genome of a Sierra Nevada endemic, the cut-leaved monkeyflower, Mimulus laciniatus (syn. Erythranthe lacinata).The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- GWAS SVatalog: a visualization tool to aid fine-mapping of GWAS loci with structural variations.Heredity · 2026Article
- A genomic approach for accurate identification of closely related species with next-generation sequencing samples.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Compressive pangenomics using mutation-annotated networks.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- The chromosome-level genome of Chinese indicine cattle breed provides insights into bovine adaptation and immunity.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026Article
- sedimix: a workflow for the analysis of hominin nuclear DNA sequences from sediments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Genome Shows no Recent Inbreeding in Near-Extinction Woolly Rhinoceros Sample Found in Ancient Wolf's Stomach.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenges in the detection and assembly of virus integration structures in human genomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- PG-SCUnK: measuring pangenome graph representativeness using single-copy and universal K-mers.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haploid high quality reference genomes are an important resource in genomic research projects. A consequence is that DNA fragments carrying the reference allele will be more likely to map successfully, or receive higher quality scores. This reference bias can have effects on downstream population genomic analysis when heterozygous sites are falsely considered homozygous for the reference allele. In palaeogenomic studies of human populations, mapping against the human reference genome is used to identify endogenous human sequences. Ancient DNA studies usually operate with low sequencing coverages and fragmentation of DNA molecules causes a large proportion of the sequenced fragments to be shorter than 50 bp-reducing the amount of accepted mismatches, and increasing the probability of multiple matching sites in the genome. These ancient DNA specific properties are potentially exacerbating the impact of reference bias on downstream analyses, especially since most studies of ancient human populations use pseudo-haploid data, i.e. they randomly sample only one sequencing read per site. We show that reference bias is pervasive in published ancient DNA sequence data of prehistoric humans with some differences between individual genomic regions. We illustrate that the strength of reference bias is negatively correlated with fragment length. Most genomic regions we investigated show little to no mapping bias but even a small proportion of sites with bias can impact analyses of those particular loci or slightly skew genome-wide estimates. Therefore, reference bias has the potential to cause minor but significant differences in the results of downstream analyses such as population allele sharing, heterozygosity estimates and estimates of archaic ancestry. These spurious results highlight how important it is to be aware of these technical artifacts and that we need strategies to mitigate the effect. Therefore, we suggest some post-mapping filtering strategies to resolve reference bias which help to reduce its impact substantially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.