Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31348507›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Community and Hospital Factors Associated With Stroke Center Certification in the United States, 2009 to 2017.

Yu-Chu Shen, Gabriel Chen, Renee Y Hsia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hospital Socioeconomic Status and Acute Stroke Treatment in the United States.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of stroke care infrastructure on the effectiveness of a hub-and-spoke telestroke model in South Carolina.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Reperfusion Therapy in the USA.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An inventory of stroke centers in the United States.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu-Chu ShenGraduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
Gabriel ChenMinistry of Defense, Singapore.
Renee Y HsiaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.

Funding

The Impact of Cardiac Care Regionalization on Access, Treatment, and OutcomesR01HL134182 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia, YU-CHU SHEN · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Lab Openings and Closures on Patients, Hospitals, and CommunitiesR01HL114822 · NHLBI · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI HSIA, RENEE YUEN-JAN, SHEN, YU-CHU · 2012 to 2020
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114822NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The increased number of stroke centers in the United States may not be equitably distributed across all populations. Anecdotal reports suggest there may be differential proliferation in wealthier and urban communities. Objective: To examine hospital characteristics and economic conditions of communities surrounding hospitals with and without stroke centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all general, short-term, acute hospitals in the continental United States and used merged data from the Joint Commission, Det Norske Veritas, Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program, state health departments, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the American Hospital Association, the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, and the US Census Bureau from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2017, to compare hospital and community characteristics of stroke-certified and non-stroke-certified hospitals and assessed characteristics of early and late adopters of stroke certification. Main Outcomes and Measures: Stroke center certification was the primary outcome. Risk factors were grouped into 3 categories: economic and financial, hospital, and community characteristics. Survival analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The study included 4546 US hospitals. During the study period, 1689 hospitals (37.2%) were stroke certified (961 adopted certification on or before January 1, 2009, 728 afterward). After controlling for other area and hospital characteristics, hospitals in low-income hospital service areas and the lower tertile of profit-margin distribution were less likely to adopt stroke certification (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74 and HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, respectively). Urban hospitals had a higher likelihood of stroke certification than rural hospitals (HR, 12.79; 95% CI, 10.64-15.37). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that stroke centers have proliferated unevenly across geographic localities, where hospitals in high-income hospital service areas and with higher profit margins have a greater likelihood of being stroke certified. These findings suggest that market-driven factors may be associated with stroke center certification.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCertificationFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMedicareProportional Hazards ModelsRehabilitation CentersResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsStrokeStroke RehabilitationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31348507
PMCPMC6661722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.