Trial reportMedicine2019
Comparison of tube feeding in stroke patients: Nasogastric tube feeding versus oroesophageal tube feeding-A pilot study.
Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Naso-intestinal versus gastric tube for enteral nutrition in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of oro-esophageal versus nasogastric feeding on dysphagia for ischemic stroke survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- [Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Coating on the Surface of Silicone Rubber Nasogastric Tube].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023Article
- Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and stroke: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on post-stroke pneumonia: Current development status and research Frontiers.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsPatients with central nervous system injuries present with dysphagia and may require non-oral feeding methods, like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, nasogastric (NG) tube, or oroesophageal (OE) tube. The prevalence of pneumonia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is significantly higher than that in patients without GER. We aimed to determine the most appropriate tube feeding with low risk of GER by comparing the results of 24-hour pH monitoring studies in patients who were administered 2 types of feeding: NG tube and OE tube.
methodsIn this pilot study, 6 stroke patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring during NG tube feeding and OE tube feeding, sequentially. Parameters collected included acid exposure time, mean esophageal pH, number of reflux episode, time of bolus reflux for both total 24-hour pH study data and postprandial data, and deMeester composite score.
resultsTotal acid reflux time (minutes) decreased more with OE tube feeding than that with NG tube feeding in the total 24-hour pH study. The number of reflux episodes decreased in both total and postprandial data with OE tube feeding versus NG tube feeding (P < .05). There were no significant differences in mean esophageal pH and total time of bolus reflux between the 2 groups.
conclusionsAlthough we could not definitively conclude that OE tube feeding decreased the severity of GER compared with NG tube feeding, there were significant differences in 4 out of 9 parameters. OE tube can be a substitute for NG tube in patients with dysphagia after stroke leading to GER disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.