ArticleAnnals of surgery2019
Hepatic Ablation Promotes Colon Cancer Metastases in an Immunocompetent Murine Model.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The Impact of Microwave Ablation on Recurrence and Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Insights From Animal Studies and Cytokine Profiling.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Engineering ROS-Responsive Bioscaffolds for Disrupting Myeloid Cell-Driven Immunosuppressive Niche to Enhance PD-L1 Blockade-Based Postablative Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- [Amiodarone promotes heat-induced apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress in mouse HL1 atrial myocytes].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2021Article
- Could hepatic ablation promote development of colon cancer hepatic metastases?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the impact of radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) energy compared to direct cautery on metatstatic colon cancer growth.
backgroundHepatic ablation with MW and RF energy creates a temperature gradient around a target site with temperatures known to create tissue injury and cell death. In contrast, direct heat application (cautery) vaporizes tissue with a higher site temperature but reduced heat gradient on surrounding tissue. We hypothesize that different energy devices create variable zones of sublethal injury that may promote tumor recurrence. To test this hypothesis we applied MW, RF, and cautery to normal murine liver with a concomitant metastatic colon cancer challenge.
methodsC57/Bl6 mice received hepatic thermal injury with MW, RF, or cautery to create a superficial 3-mm lesion immediately after intrasplenic injection of 50K MC38 colon cancer cells. Thermal imaging recorded tissue temperature during ablation and for 10 seconds after energy cessation. Hepatic tumor location and volume was determined at day 7.
resultsCautery demonstrated the highest maximum tissue temperatures (129°C) with more rapid return to baseline compared to MW or RF energy. All mice had metastasis at the ablation site. Mean tumor volume was significantly greater in the MW (95.3 mm; P = 0.007) and RF (55.7 mm; P = 0.015) than cautery (7.13 mm). There was no difference in volume between MW and RF energy (P = 0.2).
conclusionsHepatic thermal ablation promotes colon cancer metastasis at the injury site. MV and RF energy result in greater metastatic volume than cautery. These data suggest that the method of energy delivery promotes local metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.