ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
Bayesian inference of distributed time delay in transcriptional and translational regulation.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A history-dependent approach for accurate initial condition estimation in epidemic models.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Identification of four mitochondria-related genes in sepsis based on RNA sequencing technology.BMC immunology · 2024Observational
- Density physics-informed neural networks reveal sources of cell heterogeneity in signal transduction.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Inferring delays in partially observed gene regulation processes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Distribution modeling quantifies collective TScience advances · 2023Article
- Consistency across multi-omics layers in a drug-perturbed gut microbial community.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- A general model-based causal inference method overcomes the curse of synchrony and indirect effect.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Spatially coordinated collective phosphorylation filters spatiotemporal noises for precise circadian timekeeping.iScience · 2023Article
- Inference and uncertainty quantification of stochastic gene expression via synthetic models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Systematic inference identifies a major source of heterogeneity in cell signaling dynamics: The rate-limiting step number.Science advances · 2022Article
- PhysiPKPD: A pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics module for PhysiCell.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2022Article
- Hierarchical Bayesian models of transcriptional and translational regulation processes with delays.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Neural network aided approximation and parameter inference of non-Markovian models of gene expression.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Incorporating age and delay into models for biophysical systems.Physical biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAdvances in experimental and imaging techniques have allowed for unprecedented insights into the dynamical processes within individual cells. However, many facets of intracellular dynamics remain hidden, or can be measured only indirectly. This makes it challenging to reconstruct the regulatory networks that govern the biochemical processes underlying various cell functions. Current estimation techniques for inferring reaction rates frequently rely on marginalization over unobserved processes and states. Even in simple systems this approach can be computationally challenging, and can lead to large uncertainties and lack of robustness in parameter estimates. Therefore we will require alternative approaches to efficiently uncover the interactions in complex biochemical networks.
resultsWe propose a Bayesian inference framework based on replacing uninteresting or unobserved reactions with time delays. Although the resulting models are non-Markovian, recent results on stochastic systems with random delays allow us to rigorously obtain expressions for the likelihoods of model parameters. In turn, this allows us to extend MCMC methods to efficiently estimate reaction rates, and delay distribution parameters, from single-cell assays. We illustrate the advantages, and potential pitfalls, of the approach using a birth-death model with both synthetic and experimental data, and show that we can robustly infer model parameters using a relatively small number of measurements. We demonstrate how to do so even when only the relative molecule count within the cell is measured, as in the case of fluorescence microscopy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Accompanying code in R is available at https://github.com/cbskust/DDE_BD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.