Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31347676›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2019

Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck.

Cécile M D Bonnefont, Caroline Molette, Franck Lavigne, Hélène Manse, Céline Bravo, Bara Lo, Hervé Rémignon, Julien Arroyo, Michel Bouillier-Oudot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identification of Plasmatic Biomarkers ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile M D BonnefontGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Caroline MoletteGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Franck LavigneASSELDOR, Station d'expérimentation appliquée et de démonstration sur l'oie et le canard, La Tour de Glane, 24420 Coulaures, France.
Hélène ManseGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Céline BravoGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Bara LoGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Hervé RémignonGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Julien ArroyoASSELDOR, Station d'expérimentation appliquée et de démonstration sur l'oie et le canard, La Tour de Glane, 24420 Coulaures, France.
Michel Bouillier-OudotGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse INP, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France.
Génétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage · FRAGIR à dom · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In foie gras production the technological yield after the cooking process is one of the main issues of processors as it is closely linked to the cooking melting rate. This rate is subjected to strict laws and regulations since it directly affects the organoleptic and technological qualities of this gourmet product. The objective of the study was to better understand the liver fattening and the technological yield decrease during the overfeeding kinetics. A flock of 210 mule ducks was reared and then overfed during 12 D with 2 overfeeding programs; in the test group the amounts of corn in the first meals were higher than in the control group (+430 g during the whole period). Ducks were slaughtered at the end of the rearing period (D0, n = 15) and every other day (D2 to D12, n = 15 by group). Duck performances, anatomical dissections and physical and biochemical liver characteristics were registered. The performances were equivalent in the groups (P > 0.1). The evolution of the liver weight was then analyzed in detail in relation with the evolution of its biochemical composition. A two-step evolution occurred in the liver metabolism, first a main glycogen storage and then a strong lipid storage. A model to predict the liver weight was established with only BWs and feed intakes (R² = 0.83). The technological yield was determined on foie gras weighing more than 300 g (D6 to D12). The melting process was high during the last 2 D. The technological yield reached 72% at D12, for 758 g foie gras, and a strong negative correlation was observed with liver weight (-0.83; P < 0.001). A model to predict the technological yield was established with the liver weight and the liver color parameters (R² = 0.71). This study highlights the compromise between foie gras weight and its quality.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsDucksLiverMalePoultry Productsfoie grasliver weightmule duckoverfeeding periodtechnological yield

Identifiers

PMID31347676
PMCPMC6771768
OpenAlexW2978350402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.