Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31347430›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Acute Aspirin Plus Cilostazol Dual Therapy for Noncardioembolic Stroke Patients Within 48 Hours of Symptom Onset.

Junya Aoki, Yasuyuki Iguchi, Takao Urabe, Hiroshi Yamagami, Kenichi Todo, Shigeru Fujimoto, Koji Idomari, Nobuyuki Kaneko, Takeshi Iwanaga, Tadashi Terasaki and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Antiplatelet strategies: past, present, and future.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Junya AokiDepartment of Neurological Science Graduate School of Medicine Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Yasuyuki IguchiDepartment of Neurology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Takao UrabeDepartment of Neurology Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital Chiba Japan.
Hiroshi YamagamiDepartment of Neurology, Stroke Center Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Kenichi TodoDepartment of Neurology, Stroke Center Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Shigeru FujimotoDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine, Stroke Center Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Koji IdomariDepartment of Stroke Medicine Okinawa Kyodo Hospital Okinawa Japan.
Nobuyuki KanekoDepartment of Stroke Medicine Okinawa Kyodo Hospital Okinawa Japan.
Takeshi IwanagaDepartment of Stroke Medicine Okayama Red Cross Hospital Okayama Japan.
Tadashi TerasakiDepartment of Neurology Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Ryota TanakaDepartment of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Juntendo University Tokyo Japan.
Nobuaki YamamotoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Tokushima Japan.
Akira TsujinoDepartment of Neurology and Strokology Nagasaki University Hospital Nagasaki Japan.
Koichi NomuraDepartment of Neurology Shioda Hospital Chiba Japan.
Koji AbeDepartment of Neurology Okayama University Medical School Okayama Japan.
Masaaki UnoDepartment of Neurosurgery Kawasaki Medical School Okayama Japan.
Yasushi OkadaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine and Neurology Clinical Research Institute National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center Fukuoka Japan.
Hideki MatsuokaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Medicine NHO Kagoshima Medical Center Kagoshima Japan.
Sen YamagataDepartment of Neurosurgery Kurashiki Central Hospital Okayama Japan.
Yasumasa YamamotoDepartment of Neurology Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Toshiro YoneharaDepartment of Neurology Stroke Center Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Takeshi InoueDepartment of Stroke Medicine Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center Kawasaki Medical School Okayama Japan.
Yoshiki YagitaDepartment of Stroke Medicine Kawasaki Medical School Okayama Japan.
Kazumi KimuraDepartment of Neurological Science Graduate School of Medicine Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
ADS Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet (aspirin plus cilostazol) dual therapy for patients with noncardioembolic stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset. Methods and Results The ADS (Acute Aspirin Plus Cilostazol Dual Therapy for Non-Cardiogenic Stroke Patients Within 48 Hours of Symptom Onset ) study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter (34 hospitals in Japan), randomized, open-label, and aspirin-controlled trial. Acute stroke patients with noncardioembolic stroke within 48 hours of onset were studied. The subjects were randomly allocated to combination therapy with aspirin 81 to 200 mg plus cilostazol 200 mg (dual group) and single therapy with aspirin 81 to 200 mg (aspirin group) for 14 days. After the 14 days, all patients took the cilostazol 200 mg for 3 months. A primary efficacy outcome was defined as any one of the following occurring (neurological deterioration, symptomatic stroke recurrence, or transient ischemic attack) within 14 days. A primary safety outcome included intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Between May 2011 and June 2017, 1201 patients (796 [66%] men; median age, 69 [61-77] years) randomized 1:1 to either the dual group or the aspirin group were analyzed. Initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2 (1-4) in both groups (P=0.830). A primary efficacy outcome was observed in 11% in the dual group and 11% in the aspirin group (P=0.853). A primary safety outcome occurred in 2 (0.3%) in the dual group and in 1 (0.2%) in the aspirin group (P=0.624). Conclusions Dual antiplatelet therapy using cilostazol and aspirin was safe but did not reduce the rate of short-term neurological worsening. Clinical Trial Registration URL: umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000004950.

Indexed as

AgedAspirinCilostazolDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProspective StudiesStrokeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAspirinCilostazolDrug CombinationsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsantiplatelet drugclinical trialischemic strokenoncardioembolic stroke

Identifiers

PMID31347430
PMCPMC6761671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.