Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31347338›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Method for coregistration of optical measurements of breast tissue with histopathology: the importance of accounting for tissue deformations.

Lisanne de Boer, Esther Kho, Jasper Nijkamp, Koen Van de Vijver, Henricus J C Sterenborg, Leon Ter Beek, Theo J Ruers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisanne de BoerThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Esther KhoThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Jasper NijkampThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Koen Van de VijverThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Henricus J C SterenborgThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Leon Ter BeekThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Theo J RuersThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the validation of optical diagnostic technologies, experimental results need to be benchmarked against the gold standard. Currently, the gold standard for tissue characterization is assessment of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections by a pathologist. When processing tissue into H&E sections, the shape of the tissue deforms with respect to the initial shape when it was optically measured. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for these tissue deformations when correlating optical measurement with routinely acquired histopathology. We propose a method to register the tissue in the H&E sections to the optical measurements, which corrects for these tissue deformations. We compare the registered H&E sections to H&E sections that were registered with an algorithm that does not account for tissue deformations by evaluating both the shape and the composition of the tissue and using microcomputer tomography data as an independent measure. The proposed method, which did account for tissue deformations, was more accurate than the method that did not account for tissue deformations. These results emphasize the need for a registration method that accounts for tissue deformations, such as the method presented in this study, which can aid in validating optical techniques for clinical use.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHistocytological Preparation TechniquesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOptical ImagingReproducibility of Resultsdiffuse reflectancegold standardhistopathologyoptical techniquesregistration algorithmvalidation

Identifiers

PMID31347338
PMCPMC6995961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.